14 Nov '10 12:37>
ladders with rating limits
Originally posted by moggyboggI think the problem with the ladder system will be how long it will take to climb the ladder for a new entry starting at the bottom. Would a 2100 player ever want to have to climb through years of sub 1400 games just to get to the level of competition that makes sense?
ladders with rating limits
Originally posted by coquetteThere has been a good suggestion elsewhere, allowing lager leaps.
How about just larger leaps possible for players with certain ratings? .
Originally posted by coquetteLet them work their way to the top like everyone else.
I think the problem with the ladder system will be how long it will take to climb the ladder for a new entry starting at the bottom. Would a 2100 player ever want to have to climb through years of sub 1400 games just to get to the level of competition that makes sense?
So, a "step ladder" might just be the thing. Could there be some design that let's a p ...[text shortened]... player could challenge up to 40 higher? That's going to have its flaws, I suppose, too.
Originally posted by coquetteI like the step ladder idea. Why not put a limit on ladder sizes and ratings?
I think the problem with the ladder system will be how long it will take to climb the ladder for a new entry starting at the bottom. Would a 2100 player ever want to have to climb through years of sub 1400 games just to get to the level of competition that makes sense?
So, a "step ladder" might just be the thing. Could there be some design that let's a p ...[text shortened]... player could challenge up to 40 higher? That's going to have its flaws, I suppose, too.