Originally posted by moonbusSince the suspension of the Clans Forum, verbal fighting would likely be one criteria.
Any improvement to the quality of the service would be welcome.
Some have suggested better moderating (e.g., more effective, more consistent, and more transparent what the criteria for banishment are).
What specific "improvement to the quality of the service" would you like to see?
- Joined
- 20 Oct 02
- Moves
- 606236
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI think forum contributions should actually mean as much as play. GB, you would be my choice as the first inductee, you have been a tremendous poster, always upbeat, always looking to pull the positive out of others. I think its as important as MAP and quality sportsmanship during games.
Since the suspension of the Clans Forum, verbal fighting would likely be one criteria.
What specific "improvement to the quality of the service" would you like to see?
Originally posted by Bobla45Rock on!
I think forum contributions should actually mean as much as play. GB, you would be my choice as the first inductee, you have been a tremendous poster, always upbeat, always looking to pull the positive out of others. I think its as important as MAP and quality sportsmanship during games.
Originally posted by Bobla45Thanks for your kind words; however, there are other General Forum contributors who should also be considered for such recognition.
I think forum contributions should actually mean as much as play. GB, you would be my choice as the first inductee, you have been a tremendous poster, always upbeat, always looking to pull the positive out of others. I think its as important as MAP and quality sportsmanship during games.
At the top of the list I'd nominate coquette and drewnogal, Great Big Stees and Ponderable.
