08 Apr '18 23:11>1 edit
You should be able to click on the thumbs up/down (or hover your mouse over it) to see who has rec'd the post.
It will be provide a little more accountability.
It will be provide a little more accountability.
Originally posted by @uzlessWhy? In fact the rec System is a wreck.
You should be able to click on the thumbs up/down (or hover your mouse over it) to see who has rec'd the post.
It will be provide a little more accountability.
Originally posted by @ponderableYou just got rec'd.
Why? In fact the rec System is a wreck.
This is the case since the beginning. Surprisingly chess Players who often merit themselves to be very rationale are not able to use a tool as intended.
I remember "rec wars" in different ways.
Now we could add the Labels to the recs (and probably the real target?) to the thumbs down. What would happen? In und ...[text shortened]... real purpose.
Question: Who did ever discover a wortwhile thread via the "recommended" list?
Originally posted by @uzlessI thumbs that down.. just so you know.
You should be able to click on the thumbs up/down (or hover your mouse over it) to see who has rec'd the post.
It will be provide a little more accountability.
Originally posted by @ponderablei have found lots of funny posts via the rec...the rec thread should re-start every 2 weeks though to keep it fresh. Many of the single recs get buried in the back pages.
Question: Who did ever discover a wortwhile thread via the "recommended" list?
Originally posted by @uzlessVery well.
i have found lots of funny posts via the rec...the rec thread should re-start every 2 weeks though to keep it fresh. Many of the single recs get buried in the back pages.
Originally posted by @uzlessThis was a bad idea the first 20 times, and it's a bad idea now.
You should be able to click on the thumbs up/down (or hover your mouse over it) to see who has rec'd the post.
It will be provide a little more accountability.
Originally posted by @uzlessThis is a great idea and I’ve not heard a decent argument against it.
You should be able to click on the thumbs up/down (or hover your mouse over it) to see who has rec'd the post.
It will be provide a little more accountability.
Originally posted by @divegeesterHow many times do I publicly have to come out against this ego-driven idea before you actually run across one of my arguments? Do you actually mean you've never read my posts in the numerous threads where we argued about this?
This is a great idea and I’ve not heard a decent argument against it.
The main reason people want to remain anonymous is because they habitually and lazily thumb down the poster rather post itself.
Which incidentally is why the system is broken Ponderable, I.e. the recommended posts list is full of petty partisan driven voted posts, rather than being a reasonable reflection of quality or interest.
Originally posted by @suzianneAs I said, I’ve not seen a decent argument against the OP. You are a classic example of the reasoning in my precious post.
How many times do I publicly have to come out against this ego-driven idea before you actually run across one of my arguments? Do you actually mean you've never read my posts in the numerous threads where we argued about this?
Okay, I see. You said "decent" argument. Nice backhanded way of claiming none of my arguments against this have been "decent" ...[text shortened]... im you make that they do so for some other reason that is somehow more kind to your fragile ego.
Originally posted by @divegeesteragreed
This is a great idea and I’ve not heard a decent argument against it.
The main reason people want to remain anonymous is because they habitually and lazily thumb down the poster rather post itself.
Which incidentally is why the system is broken Ponderable, I.e. the recommended posts list is full of petty partisan driven voted posts, rather than being a reasonable reflection of quality or interest.
Originally posted by @suzianneSimple way to fix all of what you said....
How many times do I publicly have to come out against this ego-driven idea before you actually run across one of my arguments? Do you actually mean you've never read my posts in the numerous threads where we argued about this?
Okay, I see. You said "decent" argument. Nice backhanded way of claiming none of my arguments against this have been "decent" ...[text shortened]... im you make that they do so for some other reason that is somehow more kind to your fragile ego.
Originally posted by @uzlessIt wouldn’t need policing, people want to hide for a reason. Suzianne is the worst offender, she often turns up in a thread, takes a swipe at her detractors, thumbs all of their posts down irrespective of the content, thumbs up all the posts of the person she “likes and then disappears.
Simple way to fix all of what you said....
Just ban anyone who calls out a rec'r. You are banned for 7 days for asking why somoene thumbed up or down a post.
Originally posted by @uzlessUgh. Talk about stifling dissent.
Simple way to fix all of what you said....
Just ban anyone who calls out a rec'r. You are banned for 7 days for asking why somoene thumbed up or down a post.