Originally posted by ptriple42
Hi green,
much improved contribution,congrats.No,I still have no idea how to implement a time limit on tournaments because it would be a RHP software problem,isn't it?
You're right,that 2003 tourn.is called Having Fun. Do you call that fun, to be in a tournament not finished after 7 years?!
Off the mark again about my wish to remove fun from them.It when my opponent makes a mistake,be it lack of attention or overload.That is no fun for me.
Dude, out of the entire RHP community, you may be lucky if you can get three people to agree with you. Your idea sucks. Get over, and move on. If I want to play 3000 games at once, and I stay within the timelimits, I can do whatever I want. Deal with it.
You have 8 games in progress. Want to play faster? Join faster tournaments, or start another 30 games. There are plenty of people on this site with a lot of games in progress that play much better chess than you do, so you idea that people with lots of games in progress don't play accuratly is BS as well. People pay to use this site because they can play as much or as little as they want to.
Here are a few examples off the top of my head of a few players with lots of games in progress or who have had lots in the past who play very good chess:
User 350028
User 462807
User 129166
User 66723
Oh, and you said there is no fun in a tournament that lasts seven years. Why is there no fun in it? I'm sure the entrants enjoy.
For examply, I recently asked Chris to create
Tournament 9525. It's been filling up rapidly, and the entrants are willing realize it will take a while. Chances are, it won't finish for 3-5 years. Everyone understands that, and that makes it all the more fun. Imagine the prestige of haveing such a tournament listed on your profile.