Originally posted by TerrierJack
Because that guy "atri" had hundreds of games where he was not making any moves at all and to drop the vacation flag would have meant most of them finishing with a loss but thanks to the rules he could continue to pile on more games that he wouldn't make moves in. Again, I am not making the complaint of the original OP - he seems to want cake AND ice cre ...[text shortened]... as opposed to watering the feet of their opponents with a substance less pure than tap water.
The thing is you are advocating restricting games for players just because
one person did something that resulted in a pile of timeouts.
In March (to date) I could have joined a grand total of 51 tournaments which would have given me a total of 730 games in under a month.
You then get players such as
User 193938 who would suffer as they play loads of games, just because of atri gate?
They have finished nearly 250 games so far this month, have 763 in progress, so in the last month has been playing over 1,000 games at the same time.
To date they have played 8950 games and only been timed out in 75 games.
Restricting their game volume would be wrong.
Maybe you want admin to restrict the amount of tournaments a player can enter
or
Maybe anyone who times out more than say 50 games should have their gameloads restricted?