2nd greatest question

2nd greatest question

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Owner

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
[b]Where's the logic in that? Opinion does not Truth make. You already said it was your opinion, and it is not rational to base belief on opinion.

Dude, it's your own logic!!! "Reason and logic. The universe is eternal, otherwise it's not the universe," Is no more or less logical or opinion based than "God is eternal, otherwise He's not God."[/b]
The universe doesn't need to be eternal to be the universe. That's logic.

On the other hand, it is logical to reason that God must be eternal otherwise He's not God. God existed eternally before the creation of the universe. That's logical.

It is also logical not to assume there is no God based on finite knowledge. The knowledge of God is not by human ingenuity or intelligence, but by God who reveals Himself in creation or by direct revelation. It's simple logic.

looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @josephw
...
On the other hand, it is logical to reason that God must be eternal otherwise He's not God. God existed eternally before the creation of the universe. That's logical....
Ah! The magical sa flower. The spaghetti monster. the invisible pink unicorn! This is so logical.

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @apathist
Science does not create objective knowledge. That's 101, very basic stuff.
I didn't ask whether it creates objective knowledge. Can you use the scientific method to establish objective truth? Yes or No?

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @apathist
Science does not establish truth. It establishes knowledge. (Science is not the only source of knowledge.)

Truth is what knowledge is trying to obtain. Knowledge is asymptotic to truth - at best knowledge gets closer and closer to the truth.
Can objective truth or knowledge ever be established?

looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Can objective truth or knowledge ever be established?
Sure. Mathematics, for example, is full of objective truth. 1+1=2 regardless of anyone's opinion. Well, in any base other than 2, and given the modern definitions for the symbols, and probably other disclaimers too.

looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I didn't ask whether it creates objective knowledge. Can you use the scientific method to establish objective truth? Yes or No?
No. Science does not establish objective truth.

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28736
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @apathist
Sure. Mathematics, for example, is full of objective truth. 1+1=2 regardless of anyone's opinion. Well, in any base other than 2, and given the modern definitions for the symbols, and probably other disclaimers too.
indeed, mathematics is objective truth only in so far as the axioms allow it to be objectively true (relying as they do on the validity of human observation).

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
157883
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @apathist
I called it the greatest mystery. Connect the dots.
Personally I prefer that we are told how and why.

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28736
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @kellyjay
Personally I prefer that we are told how and why.
Let me introduce you to Mr Einstein and Mr Darwin.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
157883
28 Oct 17

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Let me introduce you to Mr Einstein and Mr Darwin.
Both of which are as flawed as you and I, Darwin I wouldn't put in the same sentence as
Einstein.

Owner

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
29 Oct 17

Originally posted by @apathist
Ah! The magical sa flower. The spaghetti monster. the invisible pink unicorn! This is so logical.
You're out of context.

Owner

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
29 Oct 17

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Let me introduce you to Mr Einstein and Mr Darwin.
Let me introduce you to Jesus.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
29 Oct 17

Originally posted by @josephw
It is not my opinion that the universe bears witness of a creator. It is an observable fact.
You are entitled to your opinion that it is an "observable fact"; it is merely your personal opinion, nevertheless.

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
29 Oct 17

Originally posted by @apathist
No. Science does not establish objective truth.
What does?

If any truth statement is only subjectively true why should anyone take it seriously?

Owner

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
29 Oct 17

Originally posted by @fmf
You are entitled to your opinion that it is an "observable fact"; it is merely your personal opinion, nevertheless.
"You are entitled to your opinion..."

Thank you for your permission, but it's not necessary, because it's not my opinion.

Information(creator) + matter(energy) = life(organized biological material) Observable, objectively existing, independent of an opinion.

Not a perfect formula illustration, but it gets the point across.