Originally posted by yo its me
Since you asked so nicely 😉 I'll take the time to articulate why I'm so sure God is real;
#I look around me and I know for certian that there's no way this is all an axcident, it was all very percisesly created. Here is a scientists explination of how balanced and exact it all is- http://www.firstscience.com/home/articles/big-theories/recipe-for-the-u ...[text shortened]... ng I have survived and so have my siblings I beleive this is becasue my mum prayed for us.
#I look around me and I know for certian that there's no way this is all an axcident, it was all very percisesly created. Here is a scientists explination of how balanced and exact it all is- http://www.firstscience.com/home/articles/big-theories/recipe-for-the-universe-just-six-numbers_1230.html
I will just address this point as the other points you raised are due to personal subjective experience which would be impossible to conclude an argument for the existance of god.
The point is Martin Rees' argument may seem so convenient, but doesn't actually prove an intelligent designer by default. Martin Rees isn't even a true believer in the Anglican church according to what he has told Richard Dawkins. I agree that Mr Dawkins is quite ruthless in his approach in The God Delusion, but here is an extract:
http://www.transworld-publishers.co.uk/catalog/extract.htm?command=search&db=twmain.txt&eqisbndata=0593055489
Of which near the end Martin Rees is just going along with the Anglican church out of loyalty to the tribe.
As for the six numbers, a more plausible explaination than just "god did it" is that there could be infinite multi-universes of infinite parameters. We are observing one set of them that fit to allow our universe to exist. There is no way we can observe any other. Other life forms in another multi-verse will see a different set of parameters which fit, which they can say, "That is so convenient, it is so perfect, so there must be an intelligent designer!". Yet in universes which the parameters don't fit, they couldn't exist, therefore no conditions for life to evolve to even observe it. It is basically natural selection on a cosmic scale.
Here is a lecture given by the cosmologist Lawrence Krauss. He tries to explain deep theoretical physics on layman's terms, but hopefully you can get the gist.
YouTube
Basically explaining that "Nothing" isn't really nothing. Sounds bizarre, but quantum physics is quite counter-intuiative as we aren't used to it in every day life, and the experiments and observations which lead onto working out how the universe started. It is over an hour long but it is worth taking it into consideration.
As for the evolution of life on Earth itself, I have also posted about it at the end of
Thread 119650.