15 Apr '18 16:25>
Originally posted by @dj2beckerNo, I asked you where you think I was “under the cosh” from you alter ego Romans1009?
A better question would be 'where wasn't that?'
Originally posted by @dj2beckerNo, I asked you where you think I was “under the cosh” from you alter ego Romans1009?
A better question would be 'where wasn't that?'
Originally posted by @secondsonAnd now jingoism 😵
Are you British by chance? Might you be holding a grudge still over having your arses handed to you back in the day?
Originally posted by @secondsonTypically, American Christians do not like to be challenged on their churchy beliefs and they don’t bear up well under scrutiny in this forum.
Today is a rare occurrence. May be a while before I have a whole day to do nothing but get beat up again. 😉
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeHear hear.
I'm sorry to hear you find the 'eternal torment' debate tiresome. Personally, I think eternal torment is a topic you need to debate more not less, in order to come to the realization how incongruous it is to the notion of an all-loving deity.
Originally posted by @divegeesterEver since you had to resort to trying to discredit him with dishonesty of using multiple accounts because you lack any other substance for debate.
No, I asked you where you think I was “under the cosh” from you alter ego Romans1009?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo ever since he’s been here? 😕
Ever since you had to resort to trying to discredit him with dishonesty of using multiple accounts because you lack any other substance for debate.
Originally posted by @divegeesterI wonder if you would take bearing false witness any more seriously if you believed in any sort of divine retribution?
So ever since he’s been here? 😕
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThat’s rich coming from a proven liar in this forum.
I wonder if you would take bearing false witness any more seriously if you believed in any sort of divine retribution?
Originally posted by @divegeesterBecker,,So???
So ever since he’s been here? 😕
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeBegging the question.
.., how do you know what is factual and what is not intended to be taken literally?
Originally posted by @secondsonHow do you decide which parts of the bible a literal and which aren’t?
Begging the question.
Revelation is factual and intended to be taken literally notwithstanding symbolism and metaphor are employed to declare a reality not necessarily understood in the natural.
Do what you want with that. The fact is there will be a judgement day, and those whose names are not found in the book of life will give an account for the ...[text shortened]... e it to say that means annihilation, if one so desires, but that's not taught in the scriptures.
Originally posted by @secondsonOnly Christians escape the lake of fire.
Begging the question.
Revelation is factual and intended to be taken literally notwithstanding symbolism and metaphor are employed to declare a reality not necessarily understood in the natural.
Do what you want with that. The fact is there will be a judgement day, and those whose names are not found in the book of life will give an account for the ...[text shortened]... e it to say that means annihilation, if one so desires, but that's not taught in the scriptures.
Originally posted by @divegeesterWhat have I lied about?
That’s rich coming from a proven liar in this forum.