A Confirmed Atheist, Charlie, Cynthia and Jan

A Confirmed Atheist, Charlie, Cynthia and Jan

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
12 Sep 12

Originally posted by twhitehead
When I try to convince others of my beliefs (or lack thereof) I do not try to coerce them.
Do you see coercion as the only way to convince others of your beliefs?
Do you only ever change your belief under pressure?
When you do 'change' your beliefs, is it really pretence in order to avoid getting mentally slapped?
You want an excellent example of a totally ignorant Believer in Christ, who doesn't know diddly squat about proper witnessing procedures and correct protocols for executing the Christian Life?

You do. Okay. I've got something to show you. Be right back.

Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
12 Sep 12

At the County Fair, 1956


For a nickel, a machine

called An Expression of Faith

would take your dime

and squash it.

All tubes and gears and lights,

the thing would groan, squeak,

fart, smoke, and finally drop

a little silver oval in your hands,

hot as a pistol,

with Jesus’ face on one side

and the Lord's Prayer on the other.

I took my medallion

home for Grandma,

but she wouldn't keep it

because it was Catholic

and had "trespasses"

instead of "debts"

and left out the part

about the kingdom

and the power and the glory.

She gave it back

and I went downtown

and set it on the railroad track.

And after the train went by

I had a piece of silver

smooth as glass and that

says something about

power and glory, by God.



-Charles Darling

T

Joined
24 May 10
Moves
7680
12 Sep 12

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]At the County Fair, 1956


For a nickel, a machine

called An Expression of Faith

would take your dime

and squash it.

All tubes and gears and lights,

the thing would groan, squeak,

fart, smoke, and finally drop

a little silver oval in your hands,

hot as a pistol,

with Jesus’ face on one side

and the Lord' ...[text shortened]... s and that

says something about

power and glory, by God.



-Charles Darling[/b]
As a well known footballer here yelled triumphantly on winning the Aussie Rules Grand Final, "That's what I am talkin about."

Good stuff. Thank you. Good Christians are really good Christians.

Perspective from a cross.

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
12 Sep 12

Originally posted by Taoman
As a well known footballer here yelled triumphantly on winning the Aussie Rules Grand Final, "That's what I am talkin about."

Good stuff. Thank you. Good Christians are really good Christians.

Perspective from a cross.
But the grandmother only rejected it because it was 'Catholic.' It's a petty, doctrinal dispute, and not a broader point about the impropriety of expressing ones faith through base and petty means. If the trinket had been properly 'Protestant', then the grandmother would have cherished it.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
12 Sep 12

Originally posted by rwingett
But the grandmother only rejected it because it was 'Catholic.' It's a petty, doctrinal dispute, and not a broader point about the impropriety of expressing ones faith through base and petty means. If the trinket had been properly 'Protestant', then the grandmother would have cherished it.
Sure, if it had been a complete and proper Lord's Prayer. However, this was apparently a mutilation of something sacred to her.

T

Joined
24 May 10
Moves
7680
12 Sep 12

Originally posted by rwingett
But the grandmother only rejected it because it was 'Catholic.' It's a petty, doctrinal dispute, and not a broader point about the impropriety of expressing ones faith through base and petty means. If the trinket had been properly 'Protestant', then the grandmother would have cherished it.
The pointing out of the pettiness got me. And the shiny silver now with nothing on it to argue about, pettiness squashed out of sight.
Pettiness is like wood termites to wider vision.
To me, there is wider vision in the poem, contrasting with the too often seen small view. That is good. Bit by bit, opening eyes see more.

Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
12 Sep 12

Originally posted by Taoman

The pointing out of the pettiness got me. And the shiny silver now with nothing on it to argue about, pettiness squashed out of sight.
Pettiness is like wood termites to wider vision.
To me, there is wider vision in the poem, contrasting with the too often seen small view. That is good. Bit by bit, opening eyes see more.
One more quote (on point with respect to viewpoint) from the venerable New England Poet, Robert Frost:

"I never dared to be radical when young
For fear it would make me conservative when old."

T

Joined
24 May 10
Moves
7680
13 Sep 12

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
One more quote (on point with respect to viewpoint) from the venerable New England Poet, Robert Frost:

"I never dared to be radical when young
For fear it would make me conservative when old."
Pure crystal.

Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
13 Sep 12

Originally posted by Taoman
Pure crystal.
http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/The_Pure_Crystal

😉

T

Joined
24 May 10
Moves
7680
13 Sep 12

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/The_Pure_Crystal

😉
A true man of the Lord. I bow.

Sans Dieu Rien >< No-thing is more powerful than 'God' & 'God' is No-Thing.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
13 Sep 12

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
One more quote (on point with respect to viewpoint) from the venerable New England Poet, Robert Frost:

"I never dared to be radical when young
For fear it would make me conservative when old."
Does that mean Robert Frost was a confirmed atheist and not inspired by God?
Sounds like it to me. However, I do not know the man, even though I have heard his name before.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
13 Sep 12

So what was Frost really? Old Testament Christian or atheist?

Elinor Frost, his wife, thought he was, like her, an atheist. In 1920 (the couple had then been married twenty-five years) Frost confided to Louis Untermeyer:


Elinor has just come out flat-footed against God conceived either as the fourth person seen with Shadrack, Meshack, and Tobedwego [sic] in the fiery furnace or without help by the Virgin Mary. How about as a Shelleyan principal or spirit coeternal with the rock part of creation, I ask. Nonsense and you know it's nonsense Rob Frost, only you're afraid you'll have bad luck or lose your standing in the community if you speak your mind.

Frost neither confirmed nor denied the accusation. A part of him, the rational part, must have known his wife was right. But in the subterranean recesses of his mind, the ancient fear continued to lurk.

Toward the end, his piety hardened. In his last letter, written a few days before he died, he insisted we cannot save ourselves unaided. "Salvation," he said, "we will never have from anyone but God."

http://www.eclectica.org/v7n2/sloan.html

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
13 Sep 12

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]A Confirmed Atheist, Charlie, Cynthia and Jan

Why do many confirmed atheists A) Vibrate over the mere mention of God (The Father); B) Christ (The Son, the God-Man in Hypostatic Union during the Church Age); C) The Holy Spirit (Third Person of The Trinity, who though invisible reveals the accurate and absolute truth contained in the inspired Wo ...[text shortened]... s just move on. How about seeing a recently released movie tonight with Cynthia and Jan" ?[/b]
My problem is Christianity is not the religion of peace, neither is Islam. They have been at loggerheads for a thousand years and continues to this day. That all screams to me, besides the suppression of women, as religions totally 100% made by men to control other men and suppress women and to start religious wars. Christians have in the past been just as bad or worse as present day muslims in forcing their religion on people of other cultures who would never convert without coercion.

Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
13 Sep 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
Does that mean Robert Frost was a confirmed atheist and not inspired by God?
Sounds like it to me. However, I do not know the man, even though I have heard his name before.
Uncertainty seems to prevail among scholars. Yet, a closer read suggests the man was definitley a seeker who, accurately,

felt his own goodness and good works were totally insufficent to satisfy the integrity (justice and righteousness) of God.

http://www.eclectica.org/v7n2/sloan.html

s
Aficionado of Prawns

Not of this World

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
38013
15 Sep 12
5 edits

Originally posted by sonhouse
My problem is Christianity is not the religion of peace, neither is Islam. They have been at loggerheads for a thousand years and continues to this day. That all screams to me, besides the suppression of women, as religions totally 100% made by men to control other men and suppress women and to start religious wars. Christians have in the past been just as ...[text shortened]... in forcing their religion on people of other cultures who would never convert without coercion.
I have a keen sense of objectivity and can certainly sympathize with onyone whom, from the outside looking in, might conclude that Christianity is "not a religion of peace." However... some context is needed here. A lot of it. First of all, what exactly is a "religion of peace?" Would it be strict, unabated, pacificism? (by the way, if so, look no further than the Quakers who are fervent Christians and pacifists)

Few religions can boast of being purely pacifist. But anyway the point I want to make is, the Old Testament conquests should not be tossed into the mixing bowl and blended in with bona fide Christianity because they are 2 completely separate things. No, I am not saying we Christians disavow loving our God who is the God of the Old Testament (and New). It's that we Christians--being Christian afterall--have a clear understanding of the demarcation between the Old and New Covenants. The New Covenant did away with aggression. That's not to say we should tolerate severe acts against innocent people (most Christians would defend a woman being raped in an alley, for example.. not walk away)... but, the New Covenant goes past and beyond acts of aggression, conquest, and violence.

That being said, Jesus made it clear that Christianity is NOT a religion of peace. Not for the reason you may think; we are not supposed to seek war against any other people including Muslims. No. But he said it's not a religion of peace because he--in his ultimate wisdom--knew that when people turn Christian, it sets us against the rest of the world--resulting in violence. So, he knew following him would not bring peace; not because we are not peaceful, but because the world outside Christianity is hostile toward Christ and Christians.

And anyone who thinks that is inaccurate must live under a rock, because it's an established fact, all over the world.