A question for atheists

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Neither did Newton know anything about BigBang... 😛

This comment is too stupid to warrant any other response than 'get knotted'. So get knotted.

As for Spinoza, his views can be applied to thinking about the Big Bang -- in ways that do not comfort creationists. But please continue to languish in your appalling ignorance and mental laziness. For you, the world was created 300 years ago, never mind 6000.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
For you, the world was created 300 years ago, never mind 6000.

*golf clap*

twhitehead dude

You have to pass this link to KM too (and, who knows...)

Originally posted by black beetle
twhitehead dude

You have to pass this link to KM too (and, who knows...)

What link?

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
What link?

Google "Mandelbro set", my honey-tongued brother;

Originally posted by Palynka
*golf clap*

Don't even think to let your Leningrand loose -I 'll take your skull asap P dude😛

Originally posted by black beetle
Google "Mandelbro set", my honey-tongued brother;

The groovy fractals that were on the cover of every popular chaos theory book at one point. Infinity and beyond! What's your point?

Originally posted by black beetle
Don't even think to let your Leningrand loose -I 'll take your skull asap P dude😛

I'm feeling too lazy to think about chess today... 😞

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
The groovy fractals that were on the cover of every popular chaos theory book at one point. Infinity and beyond! What's your point?

I know that you knew it; go to page 2 and check twhithehead's answer to TheBadBishop;

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
The groovy fractals that were on the cover of every popular chaos theory book at one point. Infinity and beyond! What's your point?

A simple rule when iterated for a long time provides the illusion of extreme complexity. I think that his point is that what seems unnaturally complex (e.g. stars, planetary systems, orbits, satellites, etc.) can be simply one such illusion.

Good to have you around good ole FF😵

Originally posted by Palynka
A simple rule when iterated for a long time provides the illusion of extreme complexity. I think that his point is that what seems unnaturally complex (e.g. stars, planetary systems, orbits, satellites, etc.) can be simply one such illusion.

Oh, right. A Huge Ever Growing Pulsating Brain That Rules FromThe Centre Of The Ultraworld.

Originally posted by Palynka
I'm feeling too lazy to think about chess today... 😞

Think not, then. That makes my task by far easier😀

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
This comment is too stupid to warrant any other response than 'get knotted'. So get knotted.

As for Spinoza, his views can be applied to thinking about the Big Bang -- in ways that do not comfort creationists. But please continue to languish in your appalling ignorance and mental laziness. For you, the world was created 300 years ago, never mind 6000.

Of course it was a stupid remark, therefore I put a smile to show that.

You know Spinoza, I don't, so? Bragging...?

Why this sudden hostility? 😕

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Of course it was a stupid remark, therefore I put a smile to show that.

You know Spinoza, I don't, so? Bragging...?

Why this sudden hostility? 😕

Sudden????!!!!