13 Mar '08 15:35>
Originally posted by cpbrown... you are still only human, and so are trapped within a highly limiting neural framework.
Clearly you are far beyond us all with logic and your fine wit.
I'd agree, but modesty prohibits such displays of public self-approbation. Perhaps you can help my cause by posting such sentiments from time to time in random threads?
Sure thing, freaky
... you can't imagine a world where you don't exist.
You'll have to humor me on this one: how ...[text shortened]... ago and results again in there being no point in me arguing with you about your beliefs?
Right. And you are suggesting that such limitations can be temporarily suspended while non-existence and its ramifications are considered.
OK, so by which process have you decided which parts of the bible to believe literally and which parts to take poetically?
Hermeneutics and isagogics are tricky things. Those parts which are intended as literal, we ought to take as such. Likewise with the remaining categories of thought and/or expression.
Do you accept the subjectivity of your faith?
I accept the subjectivity of my thoughts as they relate to my faith.
If you do, does that remove meaning, reducing it to a postmodern approach - in which case you're more or less an atheist and there is no point in me arguing with your beliefs?
Which beliefs are those, exactly?
Or are you a literalist in which case you threw logic out the window a long time ago and results again in there being no point in me arguing with you about your beliefs?
Do you literally take yourself seriously?