13 Nov '14 03:45>
Originally posted by KingOnPointNo one claims that it has.
Science has not provided us with limitless information about the things that you and I cannot see with our eyes.
Originally posted by FMFWhat I am pointing is that if Mohammad gave all of the Quran, then either Mohammad is considered lying or Jesus is considered lying. Jesus did not approve of adultery. Is it true that if 3 male Muslim witnesses see adultery, then they can kill the adulterer?
Well Muslims do not subscribe to the claims you make about Jesus, so the discrepancy is neither here nor there. What about Mohammed being visited by the Arch-angel Gabriel in a cave? Why do you deny it... or do you accept it?
Originally posted by KingOnPointWell, as far as the human spirit in concerned, I do think things "exist" which are "not seen with our eyes, nor experienced with our 4 other human senses". This does not justify or substantiate your assertion-cum-question: "Jesus died for all people and provided a way for abundant life. So, why would anyone deny what is NOT proven to be wrong by any human being?" The burden of proof is yours. If you can persuade people to agree with you through sheer sincerity and certainty, then good for you.
So why is it so hard to believe in an existence of things that are spiritual which are not seen with our eyes, nor experienced with our 4 other human senses.
Originally posted by KingOnPointWell I am neither a Muslim or a Christian. And I have not characterized either Mohammed or Jesus as "lying". It has been my lifelong observation that almost all Muslims or Christians hold and exercise their different faiths in earnest and honestly.
What I am pointing is that if Mohammad gave all of the Quran, then either Mohammad is considered lying or Jesus is considered lying. Jesus did not approve of adultery. Is it true that if 3 male Muslim witnesses see adultery, then they can kill the adulterer?
Originally posted by KingOnPointThe "existence of something" nevertheless needs evidence otherwise it is merely "faith" and "faith" cannot create the "existence of something". What you have with "faith" is something in your imagination and what is the point of asking people to deny or not deny the existence of something in your imagination?
Our eyes do not disprove the existence of something just because we don't see it.
Originally posted by KingOnPointWhen is comes to our spiritual life, we cannot afford to be wrong.
Originally posted by KingOnPointIn what way does this relate to your assertion that "Jesus died for all people and provided a way for abundant life"?
The lack of seeing doesn't make a window, non-existent. So, a bird can get hurt or be killed by flying into a window, apparently because it doesn't see the window or doesn't understand it.
Originally posted by KingOnPointPeople can say there are no spiritual things to see, if they want, and others can say there are spiritual things to see. Ultimately, which side you come down on is going to be a matter of subjectivity. I say there are spiritual things "to see" but I recognize that this is a subjective view on my part and I will not attempt to actually replace your subjectivity with mine. If you offer me reasons to believe the same spiritual things that you claim you see, then I will say so.
If we don't see all the natural things, how can we say that there are no spiritual things to see.