Originally posted by @romans1009Like I said, if you don't know what I was referring to, I don't care. The short version was there at the end.
So that’s your long way of saying,
“I have no idea, but logical fallacy sounded intellectual and impressive, and I was hoping nobody asked me what I meant by it.”
Why not just post the truth instead of a half-baked, accusatory word salad?
Originally posted by @fmfI would suggest you don’t find them convincing because you haven’t done due diligence in investigating them. To save time, start with Christianity; once you’ve arrived at the truth of Christ’s divinity, you won’t have to waste time on man-made religions.
What are you asking? You know I am a non-Muslim. You know I am a non-Hindu. You know I am a non-Jew. And you know I am a non-Christian. I don't find any of the claims about supernatural things that any of the adherents of these religions convincing and therefore do not perceive their claims about there having been a divine revelation [to them, including you] to be persuasive.
Originally posted by @romans1009Thank you for this suggestion. I am fully aware that you believe in "the truth of Christ’s divinity".
I would suggest you don’t find them convincing because you haven’t done due diligence in investigating them. To save time, start with Christianity; once you’ve arrived at the truth of Christ’s divinity, you won’t have to waste time on man-made religions.
Originally posted by @romans1009You're right to call it exactly how you see it. We all should.
Gee, this rhetorical crutch of “I already answered that” sure sounds familiar.
Originally posted by @fmfWow, again with the “I already answered that” rhetorical crutch? Come up with a new excuse to avoid answering questions. That one’s totally played.
You and I have already discussed before my views on the reasons that Christians cite for believing that Jesus and many other people supposedly rose from the dead when he was executed. My side of that conversation does not need to be repeated. Start a thread about it and see who joins in.
Originally posted by @romans1009I am calling it exactly how I see it. You haven't been here to witness Fetchmyjunk/dj2becker's eccentric behaviour on this forum in the last 2 years.
Wow, again with the “I already answered that” rhetorical crutch? Come up with a new excuse to avoid answering questions. That one’s totally played.
Originally posted by @romans1009If you think I made an accusation, produce the post. I will apologize.
Wait. I thought I was Becker.
Have the trolls abandoned that false accusation? And just when I was starting to enjoy it!
Originally posted by @fmfThen why don’t you apologize for falsely and repeatedly insinuating I’m Becker?
My posting record. Anyone can look at it. I stand by everything I have ever said and my contribution to every thread I have ever made. If anything is found that indicates a change of mind or that requires an apology, I will acknowledge and explain and/or apologize as necessary.
Originally posted by @romans1009Where is the post?
Then why don’t you apologize for falsely and repeatedly insinuating I’m Becker?
Originally posted by @fmfJust correcting yet another false assertion from you. The truth matters to some people; too bad it doesn’t seem to matter to you.
Thanks for this information about how you ended up posting what you did.
BTW, what was the handle of the duplicate account you used on here when you pretended to be a woman?
And why even go that route? I mean, why switch genders?