Alternatives to Evolution

Originally posted by Starrman
Tiny little fertilised egg grows into full human being, chemical composition continues to change every day. Small chemical compounds become much larger ones. This can be seen as chemical evolution can it not?

"Chemical evolution or chemosynthesis is as a hypothesis to explain how life might possibly have developed or evolved from non-life."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_evolution

Originally posted by dj2becker
"Chemical evolution or chemosynthesis is as a hypothesis to explain how life might possibly have developed or evolved from non-life."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_evolution

It can also refer to the transformations of simple chemical precursors into more complex, more stable, ones, given an input of energy.

Originally posted by dj2becker
"Chemical evolution or chemosynthesis is as a hypothesis to explain how life might possibly have developed or evolved from non-life."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_evolution

You capitalized the first letter when it was not capitalized in the quoted sentence. In fact, that sentence reads:

"The second use of chemical evolution or chemosynthesis is as a hypothesis to explain how life might possibly have developed or evolved from non-life (see abiogenesis)."

The sentence before it is:

"The first refers to the theories of evolution of the chemical elements in the universe following the Big Bang and through nucleosynthesis in stars and supernovas."

I think you're being deliberately deceptive! Jerk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_evolution

Originally posted by Starrman
Why? The process never completes in humans, it continues until they die and thereafter. So too with the rest of existence.

So do you feel it is okay to end that process whenever you want or
desire?
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
So do you feel it is okay to end that process whenever you want or
desire?
Kelly

Post on topic or stop posting Kelly. The process of Evolution hasn't ended with humans. We just can't see the changes happening right now because of the timescale involved.

In other news: Over 2^8 posts and still no sign of a valid alternative.

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Post on topic or stop posting Kelly. The process of Evolution hasn't ended with humans. We just can't see the changes happening right now because of the timescale involved.

In other news: Over 2^8 posts and still no sign of a valid alternative.

You post how and where and when you want to post, I'll do the same.
Conversations take many twists and turns on and off topic, and some
times they go off and come back on, you want to be forum monitor
get a job as one.
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
You post how and where and when you want to post, I'll do the same.
Conversations take many twists and turns on and off topic, and some
times they go off and come back on, you want to be forum monitor
get a job as one.
Kelly

Fine, bring up your damn Evolution = Murder point if you wish but just watch when everyone tells you that you're wrong. As they always do because you always are.

Originally posted by dj2becker
By saying there is no absolute truth you are making an absolute statement of truth, so your stance is self-defeating to start off with.

ah jeez!!!
Firstly, my usage of the word "NO" was referring to a different question (look carefully and you'll see that I quoted this different question)

Secondly, this statement of yours is a *misguided* follow up to the question: Do you believe that absolute truth exists? giving an answer of "no" (even though I didn't actually give it) here is not making any such *absolute statements*

Thirdly, I took you on here: http://www.redhotchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=53463&page=3
I don't want to play the same game twice!😴

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Fine, bring up your damn Evolution = Murder point if you wish but just watch when everyone tells you that you're wrong. As they always do because you always are.

Explain the evolution of 'right' and 'wrong' while you're at it.

Originally posted by dj2becker
Explain the evolution of 'right' and 'wrong' while you're at it.

The question makes no sense.

Originally posted by dj2becker
Explain the evolution of 'right' and 'wrong' while you're at it.

I already have. Multiple times.

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
The question makes no sense.

By saying that Kelly is 'wrong' you are implying that you are 'right'. You were making an absolute truth claim. In light of evolutionary theory, explain how 'right' and 'wrong' evolved, and how you know that you are right and Kelly is wrong.

Originally posted by dj2becker
By saying that Kelly is 'wrong' you are implying that you are 'right'. You were making an absolute truth claim. In light of evolutionary theory, explain how 'right' and 'wrong' evolved, and how you know that you are right and Kelly is wrong.

happy days are here again :'(😲:'(

Originally posted by Agerg
happy days are here again :'(😲:'(

It seems you always have all the answers..

Originally posted by scottishinnz
I already have. Multiple times.

Would you mind supplying the link to this awesome answer of yours?