13 Jul '07 13:11>2 edits
Originally posted by DoctorScribbles[/i]Sorry for the delay in responding: I lost the connection and couldn’t get back on. 🙁
What does it mean to be bounded by time-space dimensionality?
For example, theists often claim that "God is outside of time," but I have never once encountered one who could actually articulate the propositional content (or prepositional, for that matter) of that claim to me. Its close kin are the unlikely siblings "God is everywhere," and [i]als on their propositional content; that is, what precisely are they claiming to be the case?
______________________________________
Good question.
To be bounded by time-space dimensionality is to have the kinds of boundaries that enable us to identitfy and entity as an entity. Even conceptually, I don't know how to think of an entity that has no boundaries.
The statement “God is everywhere” might be a colloquial version—but what kind of “where” would we be talking about? That itself is a “dimensional” statement. As is to say that God exists “outside” of time and space—i.e., outside dimensionality as we conceive it. In a sense, a being who is “everywhere” is a being who is “nowhere”—how can it be meaningfully thought of as a being?
If I have no dimensional boundaries, then I have no definable identity—I only can say that I am “I” vis-a-vis other entities. A figure only has identity because of its boundaries vis-a-vis other figure or a background. I can identify this thought as a thought only in relationship to other thoughts, or other mental content.
To say that an entity has no such dimensional boundaries is to deny its “entity-ness.”
This kind of dimensionality (time, space, figure-ground) is part of the architecture (or “grammar” ) of our consciousness, and cannot, I think be avoided conceptually.
I don’t know what it means to say that God is an entity (or a being) who is not bounded dimensionally—or “exists beyond time and space.” I don’t think anybody else does either—which is my point. I think it is incoherent. The reduction was an attempt to demonstrate that.
_________________________________
I’ll try to catch up as best I can.