Go back
another bloody blood question!

another bloody blood question!

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
It's odd. RJHinds typed 7.5 million and then changed it to 1 million with the "1 edit".
the whole spirituality forum is bizzaro extraordinaire.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
It was you who chose to play with words when you tried to turn what is evidently a prediction into what you call "a piece of advice".
"what is evidently a prediction" Lol. That sounds so sure and factual to me. I think you are dead on with you predictions. Sounds like an evolutionist talking now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
"what is evidently a prediction" Lol. That sounds so sure and factual to me. I think you are dead on with you predictions. Sounds like an evolutionist talking now.
Can any group of Christians who declare themselves to be in agreement with each other also declare themselves to have been predicted by Paul?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Can any group of Christians who declare themselves to be in agreement with each other also declare themselves to have been predicted by Paul?
can you rub your head and tummy at the same time?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
I'm really beginng to see a thing or two about you Manny.
How can anyone who calls himself a Christian have so much hate you apparently have for JW's and who knows who else. You are getting clearer and clearer on that and hate is absolutly not a Christian trait. Would Jesus write down many of the things you have been writing here lately?
Do you reall crossing some lines that aren't so good.
Just my opinion and what I think I'm seeing...
You have no clue and speak from sheer ignorance.....I think it's just gets old is all. Your style start a post ask a question not really wanting an answer other than your already preset answer. Don't ask the question if you think you already know the answer. Just tell us what the answer is instead of the coy act you put on. This is a forum but not your pulpit however.



Manny

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by menace71
You have no clue and speak from sheer ignorance.....I think it's just gets old is all. Your style start a post ask a question not really wanting an answer other than your already preset answer. Don't ask the question if you think you already know the answer. Just tell us what the answer is instead of the coy act you put on. This is a forum but not your pulpit however.



Manny
Whatever Manny. If you don't like what I post, I think I have an idea. DON'T READ THEM!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Can any group of Christians who declare themselves to be in agreement with each other also declare themselves to have been predicted by Paul?
Well to humor you, yes. But you know as well as I do that does not exist with OTHER christian religions. And your sticking with that prediction idea? He never said it was a prediction did he? Did he say: "I think, or I feel or I hope or just maybe or it could happen or I predict". He stated a fact and one you will not admit because of the implications.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Well to humor you, yes.
So, the answer is yes. Thanks. I wonder why you just couldn't answer the question without having to be pressed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Well to humor you, yes. But you know as well as I do that does not exist with OTHER christian religions.
You claim Paul said that Jesus' followers would be in agreement. But people in your sect do not speak in agreement with other followers of Jesus.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
And your sticking with that prediction idea? He never said it was a prediction did he? Did he say: "I think, or I feel or I hope or just maybe or it could happen or I predict". He stated a fact and one you will not admit because of the implications.
If he stated what he thought would be a "fact" in the future, then yes, it's a prediction. As for the "implications" of what he said, there are none for me. So I could hardly be wanting or not wanting to "admit" them. What interests me is that you seem to be saying that Paul's comment refers to you and your sect whereas, in fact, you are arguably the epitome of Christians who are not in agreement with other Christians.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
You claim Paul said that Jesus' followers would be in agreement. But people in your sect do not speak in agreement with other followers of Jesus.
Because we are not the same as other christians and they are not the same as us with beliefs. Two seperate groups. Jesus said that not all who call on him and profess to be his followers would be in his eyes.
All the other christian religions disagree on so many things, even to the point of killing each other if their governments tell them too.
We do not disagree on any subject within the bible and it's teachings, thus that scripture and others that say the same are actually true.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
If he stated what he thought would be a "fact" in the future, then yes, it's a prediction. As for the "implications" of what he said, there are none for me. So I could hardly be wanting or not wanting to "admit" them. What interests me is that you seem to be saying that Paul's comment refers to you and your sect whereas, in fact, you are arguably the epitome of Christians who are not in agreement with other Christians.
You are correct that we are not in agreement and that is a great thing if one were to look at the record of their actions such as being involved in wars and the pagan teachings they have allowed to infiltrate their churches.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
You are correct that we are not in agreement and that is a great thing if one were to look at the record of their actions such as being involved in wars and the pagan teachings they have allowed to infiltrate their churches.
I am thankful that the founders of this country were Christians and not JW's... We would still be under British rule.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Because we are not the same as other christians and they are not the same as us with beliefs. Two seperate groups. Jesus said that not all who call on him and profess to be his followers would be in his eyes.
All the other christian religions disagree on so many things, even to the point of killing each other if their governments tell them too.
We do ...[text shortened]... e bible and it's teachings, thus that scripture and others that say the same are actually true.
So are you saying that, in Paul's eyes - so to speak, that members of your sect are the only true followers of Jesus because you agree with each other?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
You are correct that we are not in agreement and that is a great thing if one were to look at the record of their actions such as being involved in wars and the pagan teachings they have allowed to infiltrate their churches.
I don't see where you have quoted Paul as saying that followers of Jesus not being in agreement would be "a great thing".