Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo it's an invitation for people to look at my case and the evidence and decide for themselves. Their analysis may well be that I am wrong.
FMF: "People can judge for themselves. If they reckon I've got it wrong, then I will respond to their analysis."
notice the appeal to other people when pressed upon for evidence.
25 Apr 14
Originally posted by FMFwhen you cite any specifics let us know so far you have produced nothing and I am therefore forced to conclude that you have nothing but some value you have imbued to your own statements proving that you are simply willing to believe your own propaganda and expect others to believe it as well.
My thought process: is in my last 3 or 4 posts [prior to going to bed] on this thread. Evidence: your posts from page 7 onwards.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think this is a fair statement of your stance and what you have concluded. And I think I have had a fair opportunity to lay out my case too. We have therefore reached a moment where we can both rest on the points we have made. This is good.
when you cite any specifics let us know so far you have produced nothing and I am therefore forced to conclude that you have nothing but some value you have imbued to your own statements proving that you are simply willing to believe your own propaganda and expect others to believe it as well.
Originally posted by divegeesterspot on for what? you think you can just come along and dumb scriptures on people and hope that they get the sense of why you posted it? Shoddy very shoddy teaching indeed. I always provide an explanation of why I post a verse.
The scripture I cited from Jeremiah was spot on and you know it.
25 Apr 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt was self evident, others seem to have understood the meaning very easily and yet you with your colossal chess rating seem unable to.
spot on for what? you think you can just come along and dumb scriptures on people and hope that they get the sense of why you posted it? Shoddy very shoddy teaching indeed. I always provide an explanation of why I post a verse.
Originally posted by divegeesterobviously I rely on logic and reason rather than miracles for my knowledge. It seems to me that this dumping scriptures with little or no explanation may be symptomatic of a faith based on emotionalism rather than one based on logic and reason.
It was self evident, others seem to have understood the meaning very easily and yet you with your colossal chess rating seem unable to.
25 Apr 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou know exactly what it meant and it amuses me that you pretend you don't.
obviously I rely on logic and reason rather than miracles for my knowledge. It seems to me that this dumping scriptures with little or no explanation may be symptomatic of a faith based on emotionalism rather than one based on logic and reason.
25 Apr 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou said that you have "no idea" what that scripture means, do you still stand by the absolute honesty of that statement?
no i think you are engaging in emotionalism. the fact that you cannot provide a cohesive answer of why you posted the scripture is proof of that.