1. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    05 Sep '05 23:37
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    Boy, you got that right!..especially when someone is trying to pull them out of the fire.
    Well thanks for trying; when I see Beelzebub I'll tell him you weren't to blame! Tootles.
  2. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    06 Sep '05 00:06
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    You can only dream.........😲..........
    But I am done with this thread..........😕
    That's the second time you've said that. Shut up and get a move on.
  3. Standard memberfrogstomp
    Bruno's Ghost
    In a hot place
    Joined
    11 Sep '04
    Moves
    7707
    06 Sep '05 00:07
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    I am done debating with pagans...believe what you will....

    Acts 17:32-34
    32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked, while others said, "We will hear you again on this matter."
    33 So Paul departed from among them.
    34 However, some men joined him and believed, among them Dionysius the Areopagite, a woman named Damaris, and others with them.
    (NKJ)

    I never expected all to believe....see ya.....
    🙂
    Pagan's believe in the Devil.
  4. R.I.P.
    Joined
    21 Dec '01
    Moves
    8578
    06 Sep '05 00:17
    Originally posted by frogstomp
    Pagan's believe in the Devil.
    yep the tasmanian one.....
  5. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48732
    06 Sep '05 00:311 edit
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Well thanks for trying; when I see Beelzebub I'll tell him you weren't to blame! Tootles.
    You did it again marauder. Congratulations on your latest success.
  6. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    06 Sep '05 00:56
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    You did it again marauder. Congratulations on your latest success.
    You're welcome! What did I do again??
  7. Standard memberUmbrageOfSnow
    All Bark, No Bite
    Playing percussion
    Joined
    13 Jul '05
    Moves
    13279
    06 Sep '05 02:35
    Must fight urge to write a 5 page essay on all the bs in this thread...
    I'll just stick with my two favorite words: Blind Watchmaker
    Just because it's complex doesn't mean it's accidental.
  8. Standard memberPhlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4
    Joined
    27 Mar '03
    Moves
    17242
    06 Sep '05 02:40
    Originally posted by RazzleBreezer
    Isn't it obvious now that some sort of God exists? I mean Science has not yet been able to disprove religion so far. Also, the earth is so complicated that it can't be chance that it exists. Yeah, yeah I know that perhaps there are trillions of universes with every possibility of life and we just happen to live in the right one, bla bla bla, but if t ...[text shortened]... l enough to create the earth anyway. Can some atheist somewhere explain this puzzling conundrum?
    You just proved it! WoW!!

    P-
  9. Subscriberwidget
    NowYouSeeIt
    NowYouDon't
    Joined
    29 Jan '02
    Moves
    318174
    06 Sep '05 03:37
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    You did it again marauder. Congratulations on your latest success.
    'Scuse me, 'hoe, but I think I should get some credit here...
  10. Standard memberStrayJay
    I'm like a nerd
    Amsterdam, NL
    Joined
    06 Sep '01
    Moves
    33560
    06 Sep '05 04:285 edits
    Originally posted by RazzleBreezer
    Isn't it obvious now that some sort of God exists? I mean Science has not yet been able to disprove religion so far.

    As someone else already pointed out: the fact that science can't prove it false, doesn't make it true. His existence isn't even falsifiable.

    Also, the earth is so complicated that it can't be chance that it exists.

    Wouldn't God be even more complex? And why can't it be chance? No matter how small the probability, there's always a chance that an event takes place all the same. In another occurence, we might have had the shape of a pinball machine or sewer rat and still be looking for divine intervention in our creation.

    Yeah, yeah I know that perhaps there are trillions of universes with every possibility of life and we just happen to live in the right one,

    Not necessarily THE right one, just 'a' right one.

    bla bla bla, but if there are so many possibilities of life, surely one of them would have a God in it powerful enough to create the earth anyway.

    In this particular context, I think 'god' should be spelled with a non-capital G.

    Can some atheist somewhere explain this puzzling conundrum?

    Isn't that more the problem of a believer than an atheist? You're basically admitting that it doesn't take omni* (=omnipotence/omniscience/omnipresence etc., all the special traits that are attributed to God) to create the earth and all life on it.
  11. Standard memberUmbrageOfSnow
    All Bark, No Bite
    Playing percussion
    Joined
    13 Jul '05
    Moves
    13279
    06 Sep '05 04:40
    Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
    Must fight urge to write a 5 page essay on all the bs in this thread...
    I'll just stick with my two favorite words: Blind Watchmaker
    Just because it's complex doesn't mean it's accidental.
    I meant doesn't mean it's not accidental but it won't let me edit.
  12. Not Kansas
    Joined
    10 Jul '04
    Moves
    6405
    06 Sep '05 05:141 edit
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    First I have a copy and paste with permission that is a very interesting read from ...

    http://www.truthortradition.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=582&mode=&order=0&thold=0

    The Real “War of the Worlds”

    By Caitlyn Theisen


    For thousands of years, a war has raged between two worlds; one a kingdom of light, the other a kingdom of dar ...[text shortened]... y everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
    Sorry. I think you misunderstood my post. When I asked you to "go on", I didn't mean to continue posting like a non-science-knowing, so-called-religious, fanatic. I meant "gettoudda heah!" As in, "I find your views to be so far-out, I wonder if you aren't one of them aliens on the X-files" or whatever, dude (tte)?

    EDIT: My fault entirely. In the future, I shall endeavour mightily not to confuse, addle, flummox or hurl when responding to one of your posts.
  13. somewher near London
    Joined
    24 Aug '05
    Moves
    247
    06 Sep '05 15:28
    This is all completely stupid, everyone has avoided the question, and nobody has any basis at all for what they are saying!
  14. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    06 Sep '05 16:25
    Originally posted by RazzleBreezer
    This is all completely stupid, everyone has avoided the question, and nobody has any basis at all for what they are saying!
    Your question was answered many times over. One who is asserting the existence of god has no basis for what he is saying.
  15. Standard memberHalitose
    I stink, ergo I am
    On the rebound
    Joined
    14 Jul '05
    Moves
    4464
    06 Sep '05 16:36
    Originally posted by rwingett
    Your question was answered many times over. One who is asserting the existence of god has no basis for what he is saying.
    The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not.
    Eric Hoffer (1902 - 1983)
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree