-Removed-“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.”
(1 Corinthians 2:9-10)
Originally posted by @rajk999"Not everything that is true or makes sense has to be scripturally supportable."
Not everything that is true or makes sense has to be scripturally supportable. Who knows what is going on in other planets regarding sin. If they exist they will surely be at different states of development. The whole of creation on this planet, is quite likely what that means.
Really? This is hysterical coming from the one who continually says, "Where in the Bible did Jesus say that?"
I've been saying this for years, and every time I do, you call me a reprobate, or some such. You've said for years that the only important thing is the words of Jesus. You even use this to deny the words of Paul. You've fought this concept every time anyone brings it up. And yet now, just because the very same words come from YOUR mouth, they are suddenly true for you? Give me a break.
Originally posted by @suzianneYou should shack up with Ghost of a Duke
[b]"Not everything that is true or makes sense has to be scripturally supportable."
Really? This is hysterical coming from the one who continually says, "Where in the Bible did Jesus say that?"
I've been saying this for years, and every time I do, you call me a reprobate, or some such. You've said for years that the only important thing is the ...[text shortened]... ause the very same words come from YOUR mouth, they are suddenly true for you? Give me a break.[/b]
Lmfao
Originally posted by @suzianneYou are really a dunce of the highest order.
[b]"Not everything that is true or makes sense has to be scripturally supportable."
Really? This is hysterical coming from the one who continually says, "Where in the Bible did Jesus say that?"
I've been saying this for years, and every time I do, you call me a reprobate, or some such. You've said for years that the only important thing is the ...[text shortened]... ause the very same words come from YOUR mouth, they are suddenly true for you? Give me a break.[/b]
Everything that we speak of pertaining to Christianity - Jesus Christ, the Apostles and pertaining to the Bible has to be scripturally supported in the Bible otherwise it is fabricated.
We are speaking of UFOs and life on other planets ...moron. You want a bible reference for that or is it that we cannot discuss these matters.
-Removed-“Fallen angels” (I presume you mean demons)
Yes.
are flying around in spaceships
Or, what appears to be vessels capable of space travel.
which utilise a form of “unreal” (whatever that is) propulsion mechanisms
The “unreal” descriptor was applied to the results, i.e., we have nothing which is capable of such results that is also widely known.
while being chased by military aircraft.
In some cases, yes.
Otherwise, simply observed by folks both associated with the military and otherwise unaffiliated.
Such observations have been reported for six plus decades, going back even further if we’re to believe the hieroglyphics of ancient societies.
This is all kept secret from the general population, except from yourself and others…
It has been anything but a secret… for the people who have witnessed the interpolation throughout the years.
From the very beginning, the local media was keen on reporting such interactions but coverage of these experiences stopped nearly cold in the early going, with barely a blip in the ensuing years.
Well, until more recently, I suppose.
Here, a man who was deputy secretary of defense for intelligence under both Clinton and Bush is raising the call for the military to be forthcoming about what they clearly already know:
http://wapo.st/2Deg6Oj?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.0b67b07a7ac2
This one references a different man who formerly worked in the Pentagon, and headed up the former Senate majority leader Harry Reid-sponsored “Advanced Aviation Threat Program,” a highly camouflaged arm of the Defense Intelligence Agency, itself purposely nestled virtually undetectable under the umbrella of the Department of Defense:
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/18/politics/luis-elizondo-ufo-pentagon/index.html
Both of these articles came out very late to the party, featuring videos recorded in the cockpit of an F/A-18 Hornet as the pilot attempts to track the crafts observed.
Despite it’s nearly $30M price tag, the Hornet, a twin-engine, supersonic, all-weather, carrier-capable, multirole combat jet--- with a top speed of Mach 1.8 (1,190 MPH)--- was no match for the unexplainable speed of the inexplicable objects.
Whatever they were, they departed the scene leaving the poor Hornets feeling like Hildebrand & Wolfmüllers wistfully watching the Kawasaki Ninja H2R zip out of sight, with or without their dates.
It’s unclear if even our fastest aircraft, the X-15 (topping out at nearly 5,000 MPH) would be able to fare much better.
... and others who have been telling you that these space-demons will soon be enticing us to “adopt thier ways”.
Again, this is one of several speculative theories regarding the recent resurgence--- and now more generally acknowledged--- occurrences of interaction with unknown objects of undetermined origins.
While it isn’t the only idea being bandied about, it seems the most plausible of the ones I’ve heard.
That, or, as also suggested, they eat us for lunch.
Originally posted by @freakykbhHang on, hang on.
[b]“Fallen angels” (I presume you mean demons)
Yes.
are flying around in spaceships
Or, what appears to be vessels capable of space travel.
which utilise a form of “unreal” (whatever that is) propulsion mechanisms
The “unreal” descriptor was applied to the results, i.e., we have nothing which is capable of such results that is a ...[text shortened]... he most plausible of the ones I’ve heard.
That, or, as also suggested, they eat us for lunch.[/b]
'space-demons will soon be enticing us to adopt their ways...seems the most plausible of the ones I’ve heard.'
Well, that's something I never expected to read on an internet forum.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeFor starters, you have employed the term "space-demons," not anyone else.
Hang on, hang on.
'space-demons will soon be enticing us to adopt their ways...seems the most plausible of the ones I’ve heard.'
Well, that's something I never expected to read on an internet forum.
I think they're a ruse, i.e., I think what appears as aliens are actually fallen angels.
Perhaps you have (or have heard) a more plausible purpose for the flourishing exchanges the world has been experiencing?
Originally posted by @freakykbhWhat are you talking about? Space-demons came from your post.
For starters, you have employed the term "space-demons," not anyone else.
I think they're a ruse, i.e., I think what appears as aliens are actually fallen angels.
Perhaps you have (or have heard) a more plausible purpose for the flourishing exchanges the world has been experiencing?
But by all means, replace space-demons with fallen angels. Doesn't make you any less crazy.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeSpace-demons came from your post.
What are you talking about? Space-demons came from your post.
But by all means, replace space-demons with fallen angels. Doesn't make you any less crazy.
No, it emphatically did not.
Taking words from their context and tossing them for your desired result does not constitute anything remotely close to a quote.
You're calling me crazy?
That's rich.
Comment on the actual topic, why don't you?
I've done at least some of the pesky leg work of research for you, so perhaps you can lower yourself long enough to chime in on that instead of the immature passive/aggressive tack of childish insults you usually employ.
Originally posted by @romans1009Sure thing, it's nothing new for the average pilot.
That video was really interesting (just watched it.)
Thanks for posting.
Something is definitely askew.