Originally posted by @freakykbhI retract my last statement. Instead of saying you were crazy I should have more correctly said you sounded crazy.
[b]Space-demons came from your post.
No, it emphatically did not.
Taking words from their context and tossing them for your desired result does not constitute anything remotely close to a quote.
You're calling me crazy?
That's rich.
Comment on the actual topic, why don't you?
I've done at least some of the pesky leg work of research for you, s ...[text shortened]... on that instead of the immature passive/aggressive tack of childish insults you usually employ.[/b]
Life forms almost certainly exist on other planets. They are neither space-demons or fallen angels.
And I wouldn't go down the 'insult' indignation route if I were you, considering some of the depraved things you have posted in your time in the Debates forum (especially in relation to terrorist attacks where you immediately labeled them as fake and that the dead bodies shown were merely mannequins. Now that's taking insult to a whole new level).
Originally posted by @freakykbh
My take on them is two-fold.
The technological advancements required for some of the energy-related advancements we've made in the last century are, I believe, the results of contributions from what we are calling an "advanced civilization."
Those advancements include the unreal transportation capabilities we've seen both officially and unofficially, th ...[text shortened]... their advancement will entice us to adopt their ways.
Either that, or they eat us for lunch.
2 edits
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI retract my last statement. Instead of saying you were crazy I should have more correctly said you sounded crazy.
I retract my last statement. Instead of saying you were crazy I should have more correctly said you sounded crazy.
Life forms almost certainly exist on other planets. They are neither space-demons or fallen angels.
And I wouldn't go down the 'insult' indignation route if I were you, considering some of the depraved things you have posted in y ...[text shortened]... at the dead bodies shown were merely mannequins. Now that's taking insult to a whole new level).
Same diff.
Life forms almost certainly exist on other planets. They are neither space-demons or fallen angels.
Yeah?
Based on what information, I wonder.
And I wouldn't go down the 'insult' indignation route if I were you, considering some of the depraved things you have posted in your time in the Debates forum (especially in relation to terrorist attacks where you immediately labeled them as fake and that the dead bodies shown were merely mannequins. Now that's taking insult to a whole new level).
There are miles of distinction between insult and incredulity.
Now that you’ve exhausted the former, perhaps you are inclined to intone on the topic, namely: what better theory do you offer in light of the burgeoning realization that UFO’s are, after all, something beyond mere conjecture or flights of fancy for impressionable minds.
Originally posted by @freakykbh"There are miles of distinction between insult and incredulity."
[b]I retract my last statement. Instead of saying you were crazy I should have more correctly said you sounded crazy.
Same diff.
Life forms almost certainly exist on other planets. They are neither space-demons or fallen angels.
Yeah?
Based on what information, I wonder.
And I wouldn't go down the 'insult' indignation route if I w ...[text shortened]... s are, after all, something beyond mere conjecture or flights of fancy for impressionable minds.
Not to the victims or their families.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThat's a great sound bite, but the reality doesn't change.
"There are miles of distinction between insult and incredulity."
Not to the victims or their families.
You are conflating a verb with an adjective which have nothing to do with each other, posturing indignation as though you possess superior sensitivity.
And it's a crap piece of work.
When someone loses a loved one under nearly any circumstance, the normal and predictable reaction is overwhelmingly a frantic search for the cause.
If anything, a normal person would be looking at every conceivable angle in an attempt to explain what happened, hold anyone and everyone responsible.
Or, in other words, an inundation of scrutiny.
Scrutiny overload, not minimalism.
Not sound bites.
Originally posted by @freakykbh'Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes.'
That's a great sound bite, but the reality doesn't change.
You are conflating a verb with an adjective which have nothing to do with each other, posturing indignation as though you possess superior sensitivity.
And it's a crap piece of work.
When someone loses a loved one under nearly any circumstance, the normal and predictable reaction is overwhelm ...[text shortened]... other words, an inundation of scrutiny.
Scrutiny overload, not minimalism.
Not sound bites.
Proverbs 26:4-5
Originally posted by @freakykbhOf course, there's a reason that they call it "science FICTION".
Maybe!
-Removed-Now is the time you take your focus off of people, off of snarky throwaway comments which build nothing/crush everything and put out your carefully considered opinion on the articles posted herein.
After you've viewed the articles, stretch yourself to answer the following question:
Of what origin are the objects which are depicted in the video recordings from military aircraft?
2 edits
Originally posted by @freakykbhHe only knows how to debate using ad hominem attacks.
Now is the time you take your focus off of people, off of snarky throwaway comments which build nothing/crush everything and put out your carefully considered opinion on the articles posted herein.
After you've viewed the articles, stretch yourself to answer the following question:
[b]Of what origin are the objects which are depicted in the video recordings from military aircraft?[/b]
What strikes me odd are those who insist that there is other life in the universe because of the absurdity of being all alone in such a vast universe, but then turn right around and dismiss the notion of spiritual beings such as angels or demons as if it were crazy.
Very odd.
Originally posted by @whodeyHa!
He only knows how to debate using ad hominem attacks.
What strikes me odd are those who insist that there is other life in the universe because of the absurdity of being all alone in such a vast universe, but then turn right around and dismiss the notion of spiritual beings such as angels or demons as if it were crazy.
Very odd.
Originally posted by @rajk999Is this hatred you’re exhibiting an example of your following Jesus Christ’s commandments? Why do you think you have so much hate in your heart?
You are really a dunce of the highest order.
Everything that we speak of pertaining to Christianity - Jesus Christ, the Apostles and pertaining to the Bible has to be scripturally supported in the Bible otherwise it is fabricated.
We are speaking of UFOs and life on other planets ...moron. You want a bible reference for that or is it that we cannot discuss these matters.
It’s because you haven’t accepted Jesus Christ into your heart and received God’s Holy Spirit indwelling you.
What’s holding you back from doing that?