Originally posted by @wolfgang59Yes, be sure to get back in line or you’ll be the atheists’ next trolling target.
I'm not saying Goad doesn't know the Bible ...
I'm just saying it is not necessary that he does.
Originally posted by @fmf<<Nobody thinks he is "lying" about having a Bachelor's Degree in Theology, not even Romans1009 does.>>
Ghost of a Duke is knowledgeable about Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and some other religions that he's offered some interesting thoughts on. Nobody thinks he is "lying" about having a Bachelor's Degree in Theology, not even Romans1009 does. Ghost of a Duke is simply being trolled, day in day out, that's all. Romans1009 must have accused Ghos ...[text shortened]... out 100 times or more. 150 times, maybe. Often 4 or 5 times in the same day. It's just trolling.
Yes I do. And I’ve explained why. And your portrayal of Heartpence as an innocent trolling victim - when he and you are two of the most abusive trollers on here - is hilarious.
Originally posted by @wolfgang59Are you applying for the job of the atheists’ lickspittle? I heard there may be a vacancy.
Agreed.
Originally posted by @stellspalfieThat’s not at all what I said.
For clarity, I was not asserting that the claim itself was true or untrue, only that I did not find the source provided trustworthy enough to accept their claim.
The poster seemed to be stating we should accept the claim as true because several very good attorneys had claimed it to be true. Which seems to be an illogical claim.
I cited the three experts in evaluating evidence who found the evidence for Jesus Christ’s Resurrection to be overwhelming as a rebuttal to the idea that such an opinion was worthy of mocking and ridicule.
" I just saw a lot of ignorant mocking. You expect me to take you seriously?" Romans.
I strongly advise Romans to pay heed to his own words. Ignorant mocking of others will indeed result in people not taking him seriously. Not to mention of course being deeply non-biblical.
'Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.'
Ephesians 4:29
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeAre you no longer “ignoring” me? Please reconsider.
" I just saw a lot of ignorant mocking. You expect me to take you seriously?" Romans.
I strongly advise Romans to pay heed to his own words. Ignorant mocking of others will indeed result in people not taking him seriously. Not to mention of course being deeply non-biblical.
'Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as ...[text shortened]... building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.'
Ephesians 4:29
Though you never really were ignoring me in the first place (talking incessantly about me and addressing me in the third person doesn’t qualify as ignoring.)
Please consider genuinely ignoring me. Let’s give it a try!
Nice!
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by @romans1009Being an 'expert' does not exempt one from ridicule.
That’s not at all what I said.
I cited the three experts in evaluating evidence who found the evidence for Jesus Christ’s Resurrection to be overwhelming as a rebuttal to the idea that such an opinion was worthy of mocking and ridicule.
Originally posted by @stellspalfieIt should if the opinion they’re offering is in the field in which they’re an expert - unless the person doing the ridiculing is a troll, of course.
Being an 'expert' does not exempt one from ridicule.
Originally posted by @romans1009Scant evidence for both.
You don’t think Solomon existed? Do you think Jesus Christ existed?
Although Solomon is more believable than JC.
Originally posted by @wolfgang59You’re on the extreme end of atheism. Even secular historians believe Jesus Christ existed and was crucified. The debate is over whether He was God in the flesh and was Resurrected.
Scant evidence for both.
Although Solomon is more believable than JC.
Originally posted by @romans1009Not all and certainly not the character in the Bible.
Even secular historians believe Jesus Christ existed and was crucified.
Romans1009: I just saw a lot of ignorant mocking. You expect me to take you seriously?I get the impression that he sees it as his personal online disinhibition/anonymity version of the "Great Commission". I think we are supposed to be seeing evidence of "God's Holy Spirit" indwelling in him here.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
I strongly advise Romans to pay heed to his own words. Ignorant mocking of others will indeed result in people not taking him seriously. Not to mention of course being deeply non-biblical.
Originally posted by @fmfIs that any way for the “main poster” to talk about the “Best Main Poster?” I enjoy talking about Christianity and the Bible. Why read more into it than that?
I get the impression that he sees it as his personal online disinhibition/anonymity version of the "Great Commission". I think we are supposed to be seeing evidence of "God's Holy Spirit" indwelling in him here.
BTW, are you starting to ignore me the way Ghost does? Can’t stop talking about me but careful to always address me in the third person so you can claim you’re ignoring me?
Oh, Kiddo. What are we going to do with you?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by @romans1009Two climate scientists walk into a bar, both experts in their field. They both examine the evidence and draw different conclusions as to the cause of climate change Should they hand the evidence over to an attorney to find the correct answer.
It should if the opinion they’re offering is in the field in which they’re an expert - unless the person doing the ridiculing is a troll, of course.
Originally posted by @romans1009Three experts?
I cited the three experts in evaluating evidence who found the evidence for Jesus Christ’s Resurrection to be overwhelming as a rebuttal to the idea that such an opinion was worthy of mocking and ridicule.
Experts in what?