06 Oct '08 12:34>
Let B represent ---- the event ---> "the beginning of time"
The event B must have occurred at a point NOT in time or in a timeless state because "prior" to B must have been a timeless state.
Therefore if time actually has a beginning then the event B must have occurred in a timeless state. For if nothing can happen or exist outside time then time itself could never have got started in the first place.
If we say that nothing can happen outside of time or there is no such thing as a timeless state then its the same as saying that event B has to occur before event B can occur --which is of course a logical paradox.
Therefore either....
A) It is possible for events to occur outside of time (implying timeless states eg eternity)
Or
B) Time itself has no beginning and event B never happened (which also implies an eternal time dimension)
Thoughts?
The event B must have occurred at a point NOT in time or in a timeless state because "prior" to B must have been a timeless state.
Therefore if time actually has a beginning then the event B must have occurred in a timeless state. For if nothing can happen or exist outside time then time itself could never have got started in the first place.
If we say that nothing can happen outside of time or there is no such thing as a timeless state then its the same as saying that event B has to occur before event B can occur --which is of course a logical paradox.
Therefore either....
A) It is possible for events to occur outside of time (implying timeless states eg eternity)
Or
B) Time itself has no beginning and event B never happened (which also implies an eternal time dimension)
Thoughts?