1 edit
-Removed-Are you asking if it is logically possible for a person without free will to be held accountable for their actions? It seems so to me. It depends on whether being held accountable entails actually being accountable., but that depends too on whether not having free will entails not being accountable.
Suppose we who believe we have free will are wrong and we don't. Why wouldn't moral codes, incentives, etc. evolve? What needs probing is whether actual free will is necessary or only belief in free will is necessary for a moral code to evolve. After all, the belief is strong, considering the strength of the evidence. It seems to be strong enough.
Originally posted by @kellyjayPharaoh disobeyed the commands of Moses All 10 times, bringing on horrendous plagues.....because God hardened his heart All 10 times.
Can you obey or disobey without the ability to act as you will? What would be the point of the 10 Commandments if no one could do anything but what they were designed to do.
Why??? It's my belief that Pharaoh would have let the people go, on his own, but he couldn't. God intervened, and sidestepped free will.
Originally posted by @chaney3He was shown God's power and will, he knew. No one is going to have an excuse.
Pharaoh disobeyed the commands of Moses All 10 times, bringing on horrendous plagues.....because God hardened his heart All 10 times.
Why??? It's my belief that Pharaoh would have let the people go, on his own, but he couldn't. God intervened, and sidestepped free will.