Originally posted by @josephw'All' the bible is infallible. It therefore makes no difference if the discrepancy or contradiction is about something you view less important than the resurrection of Jesus. Infallible means infallible.
A copyist's mistake does not an error make. At least the translators had the integrity to not add or subtract from the manuscript.
Seriously, try and find a real error in the scriptures. Something important like in the area of doctrine. Like a major error that would cast real doubt on the veracity of the truth of God's Word.
Why do some people seem t ...[text shortened]... that contradicts what the Bible teaches concerning the resurrection of Jesus Christ for example.
One error, no matter how insignificant you personally find it, still blows the whole infallible thing out of the water. (And there are simply hundreds of such contradictions to be found,...hundreds).
-Removed-Can you remember the verse I quoted? I applied the meaning of that verse to you because of your continuous ingratiating of yourself with unbelievers and the vitriol you spew out towards Christian posters in this forum.
If the shoe fits, wear it. If you continue to expose yourself as an imposter publicly in this forum I will continue to call you out for your duplicity.
-Removed-What else do you disbelieve about the genesis account of creation?
Do you believe any of it? Or just what fits in with your own interpretation and world view?
I'm beginning to wonder just how much of the Bible you believe is literally true or not. How about the tree of life? Is that just a metaphor for something else? Pray tell just what you think that is, and how does one eat of it if it's not a literal tree? Is eating the fruit of the tree of life a metaphor too? How does that work if it's not literal?
If you believe that the genesis account of creation is allegorical or metaphorical please explain the meaning of the account if it's not literal. Try to convince me it's not literal. Start with verse one.