From a few years back. Jaywill asked but no one answered. Let's give it another go, shall we?
A serious question:
Which is occuring at a quicker pace (if either) -
1.) The rate at which new species are evolving into existence.
2.) The rate at which old species are becomming extinct.
I like this one...
1 edit
Originally posted by FreakyKBHMaybe these articles will help:
From a few years back. Jaywill asked but no one answered. Let's give it another go, shall we?
A serious question:
Which is occuring at a quicker pace (if either) -
1.) The rate at which new species are evolving into existence.
2.) The rate at which old species are becomming extinct.
I like this one...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/07/extinction-species-evolve
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/earth-faces-catastrophic-loss-of-species-408605.html
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIf you are actually interested in this, I suggest you do some research. I guess you could try some online searches for speciation rate versus extinction rate, or try looking for articles on net diversification rate. It's a rich topic.
From a few years back. Jaywill asked but no one answered. Let's give it another go, shall we?
A serious question:
Which is occuring at a quicker pace (if either) -
1.) The rate at which new species are evolving into existence.
2.) The rate at which old species are becomming extinct.
I like this one...
Originally posted by FreakyKBHFor large animals and plants, it is well known that at the current point in time, extinction is exceeding speciation. The stats for smaller creatures however are not known.
From a few years back. Jaywill asked but no one answered. Let's give it another go, shall we?
A serious question:
Which is occuring at a quicker pace (if either) -
1.) The rate at which new species are evolving into existence.
2.) The rate at which old species are becomming extinct.
I like this one...
But these rates are very recent and are due to mans influence.
Originally posted by karoly aczelI don't have a young earth theory; I hold the earth and universe to be eons old.
Nice, Freaky ...
How does this relate to your "Young Earth " theory?
But otherwise, nice🙂
I find the two-part question intriguing, given its application to the overall theory of evolution.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSpecies are becoming extinct at a much greater rate than that at which they are evolving.
From a few years back. Jaywill asked but no one answered. Let's give it another go, shall we?
A serious question:
Which is occuring at a quicker pace (if either) -
1.) The rate at which new species are evolving into existence.
2.) The rate at which old species are becomming extinct.
I like this one...
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThe total number of non-bacterial species in the world has been estimated at 8.7 million, with previous estimates ranging from two million to 100 million.
From a few years back. Jaywill asked but no one answered. Let's give it another go, shall we?
A serious question:
Which is occuring at a quicker pace (if either) -
1.) The rate at which new species are evolving into existence.
2.) The rate at which old species are becomming extinct.
I like this one...
(from Wiki)
Makes your questions unanswerable.