Bloodless surgery wanted by the army......

-Removed-

here is your question quoted verbatim.

Are you suggesting they are not using blood because they think blood is bad and carries the sexual urges, addictions and sins of the donor?

I am asking you after watching the video and reading his post where you think he suggests that? So far you have been unable to answer despite being asked numerous times. So where does he suggest it.

-Removed-

Its not explicit? Is there anyway that after watching the video anyone could possibly think that it suggests that the army think that blood is bad, contains the sins, addiction, lusts and urges of the donor? Your words.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its not explicit? Is there anyway that after watching the video anyone could possibly think that it suggests that the army think that blood is bad, contains the sins, addiction, lusts and urges of the donor? Your words.

You seem to be behaving as if you think galveston75's beliefs regarding blood transfusions cannot or must not be probed or addressed or elicited on this thread. Is that your intention?

-Removed-

Here is the question I am asking you,

Is there anyway that after watching the video anyone could possibly think that it suggests that the army think that blood is bad, contains the sins, addiction, lusts and urges of the donor? Your words.

-Removed-

because I am asking you, those are your words.

You cannot tell us why anyone who watched the presentation might think that it suggested that the army thought that blood was bad and carried the sins, lusts etc of the donor. Infact its absurd to think that after watching the video anyone would think that it suggested that the army thought blood was bad and carried the sins lust etc of the donor, isn't it. So we are left with the question why you thought that it might suggest that? because clearly you never got it from watching the presentation nor can you tell us why anyone who is sane might get that impression from the presentation.

Did you think you could use it to take another cheap shot at Jehovahs Witnesses? Do you think it accomplished what you set out because I can tell you the only person looking like a moron is you.

-Removed-

That it has nothing to do with the video is more bull than a whole heard of Texan longhorns, here are your words again,

Are you suggesting they are not using blood because they think blood is bad and carries the sexual urges, addictions and sins of the donor? - divesjeester

Who are the 'they' you are referring to if it has nothing to do with the video as you are now claiming?

I am not asking Galveston about his video or his words, I have no problem with the video or his words but i have a problem with your comments so I am asking you about your words.

-Removed-

I am asking you about your words, who are the they you are referring to in your comment? You have made the claim that your words are not about the video then you will tell us who are the 'they' that you refer to when you made this comment,

Are you suggesting they are not using blood because they think blood is bad and carries the sexual urges, addictions and sins of the donor? - divesjeester