Originally posted by RJHinds The following is Lehigh University's position from the Department of Biological Sciences on evolution and "Intelligent Design":
The faculty in the Department of Biological Sciences is committed to the highest standards of scientific integrity and academic function. This commitment carries with it unwavering support for academic freedom and the free exchan ...[text shortened]... effort to prove him wrong. So this means Professor Behe could still be RIGHT!
Originally posted by Proper Knob What relevance does this have to anything we're discussing?
Behe accpets common descent. Now what's your point?
The point is Professor Behe believes in "Intelligent Design" even though
this is against the position of the University. Intelligent Design could be TRUE and Professor Behe could be RIGHT in believing in it.
Originally posted by RJHinds The point is Professor Behe believes in "Intelligent Design" even though
this is against the position of the University. Intelligent Design could be TRUE and Professor Behe could be RIGHT in believing in it.
No it can't and no he can't.
Intelligent design is not a scientific hypothesis let alone theory.
Originally posted by googlefudge Again no, whether evolution happens or not it is not called a theory because it isn't real or hasn't been proved,
that just isn't what the term means.
Gravity is real, it is a fact that objects with mass attract other objects with mass.
There is a scientific law of universal gravity that says that masses attract each other and do so all over the ...[text shortened]... h?v=_wv6kgjOEL0&feature=related
Originally posted by RJHinds The point is Professor Behe believes in "Intelligent Design" even though
this is against the position of the University. Intelligent Design could be TRUE and Professor Behe could be RIGHT in believing in it.
The point is Professor Behe accepts common descent and that we also evolved. I have no idea what you are wittering on about.
Originally posted by Proper Knob The point is Professor Behe accepts common descent and that we also evolved. I have no idea what you are wittering on about.
He says that since he has gained more knowledge he is doubting what he
had been taught on evolution because Darwin's evolution does not explain
certain things he has discovered.
I doubt if I'll have the time to that book on evolution because I just got
two new books on chess that I wish to read and want have any time for
fiction books for awhile.
P.S. I probably will not be posting much for awhile either. I know you
will like that.
Originally posted by RJHinds He says that since he has gained more knowledge he is doubting what he
had been taught on evolution because Darwin's evolution does not explain
certain things he has discovered.
I doubt if I'll have the time to that book on evolution because I just got
two new books on chess that I wish to read and want have any time for
fiction books for awhile.
P.S. I probably will not be posting much for awhile either. I know you
will like that.
Show me a quote where he now says he doesn't accept common descent. If you can't show me that then your frankly talking out your arse as per usual. As for not reading the book i suggested, of course you won't you love your ignorance too much.
P.S. Post as much or as little as you want. The more diverse opinions the better in my book. If you leave, there will be another creationist wally to take your place, there's plenty of you.
Originally posted by sumydid I don't know a single Christian who believes man was borne from apes. Nor has it been proven that man was borne from apes which is why it's called the [b]Theory of Evolution.
Now, I understand there are these so-called "Liberal Christians" out there, and they are growing in number. To them, the bible is a bunch of guff to be taken very ...[text shortened]... he professors themselves believe, teach, and preach this horrid apostasy of a doctrine.[/b]
ahem.
I am not amused.
You're smarter than evidenced by this post. You know better than this.
Originally posted by RJHinds Can't you think of another word to use other than evolved. I want to get
rid of that word. Can't we at least like bleep it by using "x's" or *******?
Would you like to burn all the biology textbooks as well?
Break It Down
18 Nov '11 14:05
Back to Top