04 Aug '17 07:33>
Originally posted by @chaney3If, as you say, I am "wrong" about how I describe it, how would you describe the connection KellyJay and I had before the disagreement about governments intervening to protect children?
You are wrong.
Originally posted by @chaney3If, as you say, I am "wrong" about how I describe it, how would you describe the connection KellyJay and I had before the disagreement about governments intervening to protect children?
You are wrong.
Originally posted by @chaney3The OP is about the hypocrisy of KellyJay giving a little homily and reprimand about ignoring what another poster posts. You read the OP again, and see what I mean.
Read the OP again.
Originally posted by @fmfWhy are you living in the past?
If, as you say, I am "wrong" about how I describe it, how would you describe the connection KellyJay and I had before the disagreement about governments intervening to protect children?
Originally posted by @fmfDive hates being ignored.
The OP is about the hypocrisy of KellyJay giving a little homily and reprimand about ignoring what another poster posts. You read the OP again, and see what I mean.
Originally posted by @chaney3If you read the OP, KellyJay is being called out ~ very explicitly and specifically ~ for hypocrisy in chiding another poster for ignoring what someone has posted. That's what the 'calling out' in the thread title "Calling out KellyJay" is referring to.
Dive hates being ignored.
That's the thread, and the OP.
Originally posted by @fmfDive was ASSUMING something that he had NO business doing.
If you read the OP, KellyJay is being called out ~ very explicitly and specifically ~ for hypocrisy in chiding another poster for ignoring what someone has posted. That's what the 'calling out' in the thread title "Calling out KellyJay" is referring to.
Originally posted by @chaney3I am not. KellyJay is still "rubbed up the wrong way" by a disagreement a couple of years ago. I, meanwhile, have been treating him normally: posting as usual, contributing to his threads, reacting to what he says, asking him questions. His silence (due to an unwillingness or inability to engage) is surely him "living in the past", as you put it, and not me?
Why are you living in the past?
Originally posted by @chaney3In other words you are talking through the top of your hat.
Enough said.
Originally posted by @chaney3I'm afraid that I am unable to take attitudinal reprimands from a drunken abusive nit-wit like you chaney3.
Poor attitude Dive. Poor.
Originally posted by @divegeesterNo.
In other words you are talking through the top of your hat.
Originally posted by @chaney3You have telling me for years that you don't like me and that you want to duff me up.
KellyJay should continue to ignore both of you.
Neither of you seem interested in repairing the relationship.
Snobby and arrogant on your parts.
Originally posted by @divegeesterWhy the abuse?
I'm afraid that I am unable to take attitudinal reprimands from a drunken abusive nit-wit like you chaney3.
Originally posted by @chaney3What is it that you think FMF or I can actually fix. KellyJay took offence at a postion that neither of us has changed our view on. I think (and I believe FMF does too) that KellyJay got the wrong end of the stick but has been unable to make a u-turn due to his prickly pride.
You are too arrogant to fix it.
Originally posted by @divegeesterFix?
What is it that you think FMF or I can actually fix. KellyJay took offence at a postion that neither of us has changed our view on. I think (and I believe FMF does too) that KellyJay got the wrong end of the stick but has been unable to make a u-turn due to his prickly pride.