Calling out KellyJay

Originally posted by @dj2becker
You have reasons for ignoring posts so does Kelly.

Look, I get that you might see some sort of version of virtue in your self-sacrificial, partisan loyalty to KellyJay. I'm not interested in that. I am more interested in what virtue you think there is in you pretending there is the "parallel" as you suggest.

Originally posted by @fmf
So if I ignored this utterly disingenuous post by you, it would have - to your self-confessed teenage way of thinking - a parallel to KellyJay's ever expanding list of dissenters whose every post - hundreds and hundreds of them, all on-topic, all inconvenient - that he blanks out, day in day out, even as he lectures people on not ignoring posts and lectures the ...[text shortened]... ing people even if they don't share his beliefs? Is that the "parallel" you are claiming exists?

If Dive is allowed to have reasons for ignoring posts, why can't Kelly?

Originally posted by @fmf
Look, I get that you might see some sort of version of virtue in your self-sacrificial, partisan loyalty to KellyJay. I'm not interested in that. I am more interested in what virtue you think there is in you pretending there is the "parallel" as you suggest.

Look, I get that you might see some sort of version of virtue in your self-sacrificial, partisan loyalty to Divegeester. I'm not interested in that. I am more interested in what virtue you think there is in you pretending that Divegeester is allowed to have reasons for ignoring posts and Kelly isn't.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If Dive is allowed to have reasons for ignoring posts, why can't Kelly?

Is it that you didn't understand my question or did you just find it inconvenient?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Look, I get that you might see some sort of version of virtue in your self-sacrificial, partisan loyalty to Divegeester. I'm not interested in that. I am more interested in what virtue you think there is in you pretending that Divegeester is allowed to have reasons for ignoring posts and Kelly isn't.

But this gimmick doesn't work. The question was a genuine one. You copy pasting it and changing a few words, instead of actually dealing with what I have put to you, is a dodge.

Originally posted by @fmf
Is it that you didn't understand my question or did you just find it inconvenient?

I could ask you the exact same question.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If Dive is allowed to have reasons for ignoring posts, why can't Kelly?

Do you think the government has a duty and right to intervene to protect children from parents who plan to just let them die for religious reasons?

Is this question going to result in either you or divegeester ignoring every single post from me on every single topic for the next 2 years?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I could ask you the exact same question.

If you are, then it it is just another dodge. Because it is you who is pretending there is some parallel, not me.

Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think the government has a duty and right to intervene to protect them from parents who might just let them die for religious reasons?

Is this question going to result in either you or divegeester ignoring every single post from me on every single topic for the next 2 years?

We are obviously not Kelly his reasons for ignoring posts may be different to ours.

Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think the government has a duty and right to intervene to protect children from parents who plan to just let them die for religious reasons?

Is this question going to result in either you or divegeester ignoring every single post from me on every single topic for the next 2 years?

Person A has his own personal reasons for ignoring posts.

Person B has his own personal reasons for ignoring posts.

I see a parallel. If you don't that's fine with me.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
We are obviously not Kelly his reasons for ignoring posts may be different to ours.

So to get back to the OP, how is it not hypocritical for KellyJay to reprimand another poster (divegeester, if I am not mistakwn) for ignoring one post, or for him to condemn shunning people, or to exhort people to engage others even if one disagree with them?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Person A has his own personal reasons for ignoring posts.

Person B has his own personal reasons for ignoring posts.

I see a parallel. If you don't that's fine with me.

The thread is about hypocrisy.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
We are obviously not Kelly his reasons for ignoring posts may be different to ours.

What is the reason for his hypocrisy about ignoring posts?

Originally posted by @fmf
So to get back to the OP, how is it not hypocritical for KellyJay to reprimand another poster (divegeester, if I am not mistakwn) for ignoring one post, or for him to condemn shunning people, or to exhort people to engage others even if one disagree with them?

How could Kelly possibly be reprimanding Dive when he is ignoring him?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Whom was Kelly reprimanding?

In his inimitable passive aggressive way, it appears, the recipient of KellyJay's reprimand was intended to be divegeester. Have you not been following?