3 edits
Jesus said it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, and that it is easier for a "camel" to go through the "eye of a needle" than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. Matthew 19:23-24, Mark 10:24-25, and Luke 18:24-25.
Is it possible that there is a mistranslation in the Bible, and that the Bible is not 100% accurate? That the Greek word camel (kamilos) is almost identical to the Greek word rope (kamêlos). And the word was mistranslated as camel instead of rope.
It is easier for a "rope" to go through an eye of a needle than for a rich man to get to heaven.
It is easier for a "camel" to go through an eye of a needle than for a rich man to get to heaven.
Doesn't "rope" really make more sense and a better fit than "camel" in the metaphor?
Originally posted by moon1969the "eye of the needle" was a city gate in ancient times shaped like the eye of a needle. When the city gates were closed for the evening the only way a traveler could enter was by the eye of the needle. The gate was barely large enough for a full grown man to walk through. A camel would have to be unpacked and would need to crawl through on its knees. Most camels were not trained for this, so it was unlikely that a traveler would attempt it.
Jesus said it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, and that it is easier for a "camel" to go through the "eye of a needle" than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. Matthew 19:23-24, Mark 10:24-25, and Luke 18:24-25.
Is it possible that there is a mistranslation in the Bible, and that the Bible is not 100% accurate? That the Gr ...[text shortened]... oesn't "rope" really make more sense and a better fit than "camel" in the metaphor?
Originally posted by DowardThe "City Gate" story has no historical evidence for it (though it has been put forward as fact for a long, long time. Another explanation is of a mountain pass which travellers used that at one point narrowd and was known as the "eye of the needle".
the "eye of the needle" was a city gate in ancient times shaped like the eye of a needle. When the city gates were closed for the evening the only way a traveler could enter was by the eye of the needle. The gate was barely large enough for a full grown man to walk through. A camel would have to be unpacked and would need to crawl through on its knees. Most camels were not trained for this, so it was unlikely that a traveler would attempt it.
The more likely explanation is it is a reworking of an older saying about elephants going through the eye of a needle (ie an impossibility)
Christians debate the "eye of a needle" story because it is ambiguous whether or not jesus was discussing something difficult or impossible.
Originally posted by wolfgang59It is impossible for a rich man to enter the kingdom of god.
The "City Gate" story has no historical evidence for it (though it has been put forward as fact for a long, long time. Another explanation is of a mountain pass which travellers used that at one point narrowd and was known as the "eye of the needle".
The more likely explanation is it is a reworking of an older saying about elephants going through the e ...[text shortened]... use it is ambiguous whether or not jesus was discussing something difficult or impossible.
Originally posted by rwingettAnd Jesus said to His disciples, “Truly I say to you, it is hard for a rich man to
It is impossible for a rich man to enter the kingdom of god.
enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go
through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”
When the disciples heard this, they were very astonished and said, “Then who
can be saved?” And looking at them Jesus said to them, “With people this is
impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
(Matthew 19:23-26 NASB)
Originally posted by RJHindsYou can quibble about how hard 'hard' is, but I say the very nature of the kingdom precludes the admission of rich men. Mind you, though, my definition of all the terms involved is not of the standard variety.
And Jesus said to His disciples, “Truly I say to you, it is hard for a rich man to
enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go
through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”
When the disciples heard this, they were very astonished and said, “Then who
can be saved?” And looking at them ...[text shortened]... people this is
impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
(Matthew 19:23-26 NASB)
Originally posted by rwingettI have admired your leftist tilt for years here. Your atheist views, not so much.
You can quibble about how hard 'hard' is, but I say the very nature of the kingdom precludes the admission of rich men. Mind you, though, my definition of all the terms involved is not of the standard variety.
Imagine a Christian version of your leftist views and that's pretty much me.
Well, maybe with a few different other parts. 🙂
Originally posted by SuzianneNot exactly "leftist," but an excellent commentary on this passage and others relating to money and the Christian life: "Happy are You Poor" by Fr. Thomas Dubay.
I have admired your leftist tilt for years here. Your atheist views, not so much.
Imagine a Christian version of your leftist views and that's pretty much me.
Well, maybe with a few different other parts. 🙂
1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneAs an atheist, my beef with Christians these days is restricted primarily to conservative Christians. Whether someone believes in god, in and of itself, is of little concern to me. Unlike many other atheists on this forum, I no longer have any interest in bashing all religious belief, but restrict my bashing to the more conservative manifestations of that belief. If some of the more antiquated mythology and any pretense of certainty were to be dropped, I might even concede that Christianity may have some social utility. It's emphasis on social justice (which too many Christians choose to ignore) may be its saving grace.
I have admired your leftist tilt for years here. Your atheist views, not so much.
Imagine a Christian version of your leftist views and that's pretty much me.
Well, maybe with a few different other parts. 🙂
Originally posted by DowardThe original Greek tells not of a camel, but a rope (kamilos ). When it was translated into Latin, kamilos was confused with kamelos (camel).
the "eye of the needle" was a city gate in ancient times shaped like the eye of a needle. When the city gates were closed for the evening the only way a traveler could enter was by the eye of the needle. The gate was barely large enough for a full grown man to walk through. A camel would have to be unpacked and would need to crawl through on its knees. Most camels were not trained for this, so it was unlikely that a traveler would attempt it.
This translation error has been perpetuated into almost every language in which the Scriptures has been printed.