Originally posted by RJHinds Evolution has never explained anything. Evolution is just a new word invented by atheists to take the place of explantions that were already known, like adaptation and breeding, and to speculate with false ideas of what might have happened in the past if there was no God. 😏
Evolution explains, among other things, how come genes from all examined organisms describe one single family tree rather than a bunch of separate kind trees, as you would expect if creationism was correct. This fact alone brings creationism as a scientific endevour to a fantastic "hit the concrete"-halt, while it's wind beneath the wings of evolution. 😏
Originally posted by C Hess Evolution explains, among other things, how come genes from all examined organisms describe one single family tree rather than a bunch of separate kind trees, as you would expect if creationism was correct. This fact alone brings creationism as a scientific endevour to a fantastic "hit the concrete"-halt, while it's wind beneath the wings of evolution. 😏
You should be called I Diot
God made "Evilution" look plausible as a test.
It says so in the bible; Idiots 2: 15 "Thou shalt not believeth anything
of sense for it is offensive to Mine eyes" speaketh the Lord Vadar.
nb: Capitalisation of "Mine" is further proof of God.
Originally posted by C Hess Evolution explains, among other things, how come genes from all examined organisms describe one single family tree rather than a bunch of separate kind trees, as you would expect if creationism was correct. This fact alone brings creationism as a scientific endevour to a fantastic "hit the concrete"-halt, while it's wind beneath the wings of evolution. 😏
There is no proof that evolution explains anything about genes, since evolution can not even account for the existence of genes. Genes can begin to be explained by understanding DNA programming. 😏
Originally posted by RJHinds There is no proof that evolution explains anything about genes, since evolution can not even account for the existence of genes. Genes can begin to be explained by understanding DNA programming. 😏
There is no proof that Newton's laws explain anything about gravity, since Newton's laws can't even account for the existence of gravity. Gravity can begin to be explained by understanding mumbo jumbo. 😏
Originally posted by C Hess There is no proof that Newton's laws explain anything about gravity, since Newton's laws can't even account for the existence of gravity. Gravity can begin to be explained by understanding mumbo jumbo. 😏
What you think of gravity and Fig Newtons Law is irrelevant.
I haven't laughed out loud like this in a long time!
Thumbs up!
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
16 Apr '15 17:481 edit
Originally posted by twhitehead According to Wikipedia, he is an ethologist and evolutionary biologist. These are two related branches of Biology. Would you not agree that 'evolutionary biologist' would be a better term for RD, but probably would not suit someone like me who has a degree in Mathematics? I understand the basics of evolutionary biology, as well as the basics of DNA (I hav ...[text shortened]... , so I presume that at least part of her work is evolutionary biology. Is she an 'evolutionist'?
According to dictionary.com
evoluitionist -
noun
1.
a person who believes in or supports a theory of evolution, especially in biology.
2.
a person who supports a policy of gradual growth or development rather than sudden change or expansion.
Why waste time insisting Richard Dawkins is not an evolutionist ?
What does it do for you?
Originally posted by sonship Why waste time insisting Richard Dawkins is not an evolutionist ?
Because it represents a clear misunderstanding of what evolution is.
According to dictionary.com
evoluitionist -
noun
1.
a person who believes in or supports a theory of evolution, especially in biology.
Which seems to suggest evolution is either a religion or political view. It is neither.
Sorry, but that definition does not fit RD, nor does it fit me.
What does it do for you? Hopefully, I can help you to understand your error. Slim chance given your history of never admitting a mistake however obvious.
Originally posted by twhitehead You are not a gravitist I hope? Gravitists don't go to heaven. Believing in gravity is clearly incompatible with the concept of rising up to heaven.
As far as I can tell, Richard Dawkins only writes about speculations in science and has not actual done any real science himself. What peer reviewed papers has Richard Dawkins published in scientific journals that has revealed new scientific facts? 😏
Can An Evolutionist Be a Christian ?
16 Apr '15 07:52
Back to Top