nope! YOU can't! You might want to keep your distance from computers in the future otherwise they might blow up when trying to microwave something! Indeed the respective sciences which lead to these devices are just a sequence of seemingly lucky guesses.
Originally posted by Agerg nope! YOU can't! You might want to keep your distance from computers in the future otherwise they might blow up when trying to microwave something! Indeed the respective sciences which lead to these devices are just a sequence of seemingly lucky guesses.
I'll know if you haven't taken my advice btw 😞
We can get good results from science as long as we don't have
scientist that have a bias and agenda against God. It doen't
hurt to make a few lucky guesses along the way as long as
the person doing the science is not making all guesses like most
of those dealing with evolution and the age of the universe.
Originally posted by RJHinds We can get good results from science as long as we don't have
scientist that have a bias and agenda against God. It doen't
hurt to make a few lucky guesses along the way as long as
the person doing the science is not making all guesses like most
of those dealing with evolution and the age of the universe.
You didn't take my advice. I'm only thinking of you! 😞
Originally posted by RJHinds We can get good results from science as long as we don't have
scientist that have a bias and agenda against God. It doen't
hurt to make a few lucky guesses along the way as long as
the person doing the science is not making all guesses like most
of those dealing with evolution and the age of the universe.
What a weird little black and white word you must live in. There are scientists who believe in God who also accept the evidence for evolution, Kenneth Miller springs to mind -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_R._Miller
There are also scientists who believe in God who also accept the age of the universe as older than 10,00 years. Here's one of jaywill's favourites -
http://www.reasons.org/
Do these scientists have a 'biased agenda' towards God?! Explain that one to me.
Originally posted by twhitehead So the people who developed your computer (which you trust and clearly was a good result), didn't have a bias and agenda against God?
Originally posted by Proper Knob What a weird little black and white word you must live in. There are scientists who believe in God who also accept the evidence for evolution, Kenneth Miller springs to mind -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_R._Miller
There are also scientists who believe in God who also accept the age of the universe as older than 10,00 years. Here's one of ...[text shortened]... ons.org/
Do these scientists have a 'biased agenda' towards God?! Explain that one to me.
Maybe one or the other. However, I would doubt if they ever amount
to anything.
the youtube you provided has lead me to other videos by thethinkingatheist that entertained me all day.
try and view "the creation story" and "noah's ark : god, giraffes and genocides".
also top 10 creationist arguments part 1 and 2.
It may be entertaining, but unlike the one I linked, the others are filled
with half-truths and lies. So be careful for you might get suckered in by
them.
Well, since some of the same scientists involved are involved in the Theory of Relativity (that you dispute), astronomy, geology, biology and various other science, you should have no problem with them either.
Originally posted by divegeester The only scientists you can't trust are the meteorologists.
I think you are talking about the weatherman. I don't consider
them scientist because all their predictions are educated guesses.
It may be classified a science, but it is not an exact science because
they got much to learn from God.
Can you trust science?
18 Aug '11 09:51
YouTube
Back to Top