Originally posted by RJHinds
Scientist that have a bias and an agenda against God are not going to
do good science because they will munipulate the result against God.
Scientists, or people following the basics of scientific method before it
had been codified and the name coined, have been exploring the universe
and trying to explain it long before most of them were atheists.
It was in fact due to what these (largely Christian) theistic scientists discovered
that most today are now non-religious.
Plus whether you believe in religion or not.
No explanation, true or false, that includes god or the supernatural AS the
explanation for how or why something happens can ever be scientific.
When we want to explain something we have to do it in terms of other things
we already understand. Otherwise if you explain something in terms of something
we don't understand you then have to explain the new thing you don't understand
that supposedly explains the first thing you don't understand, which in reality means
you haven't got any closer to an actual explanation of how or why this thing you are
trying to explain worked/happened.
If your explanation of how or why something happened is some variant on god did it,
then you are basically saying it happened by magic, ie we don't know why it happened
and so we will just give up and say something supernatural did it.
This explains nothing, and dose not have any predictive value.
It is not science.
If you put your god into the gaps in our understanding and say 'here is something we don't
understand so god must have done it' and then someone explains the gap without god,
your god just got smaller and squeezed out.
Evolution is NOT a gap in our understanding, currently the creation of the first self replicating
entity that we might term a life form has not been fully explained, but this is not a problem with
evolution as evolution only describes the diversity not the origin of life.
That said their is no particular reason to suppose that science won't close this particular gap, and
probably in the relatively near future.
You have said repeatedly for years that science has no proof for evolution, and other such nonsense.
If you are prepared to debate with an open mind, I am prepared to demonstrate that not only is
evolution a viable explanation, with mountains of evidence, not one fact in dispute with it, but that
it is the ONLY viable solution, and that evolution is a logical inevitability for any system with self
replication and mutation.
When I am done, and you have been through all of the arguments and evidence,
you will be forced to admit publicly that evolution is correct.
Are you prepared to accept this challenge? (to be held in science forum)
EDIT: Note this would not be a debate of the legitimacy of religion or the existence of god.
Simply a discussion of the scientific legitimacy of evolution by natural selection.