Go back
Chromosomes support Creation?

Chromosomes support Creation?

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
I pity your entire family.
Why? Because I don't insult women? Or make jokes about God?

I pity you.


Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Do you think you have any misconceptions about the Easter Bunny?
Do you have any misconceptions about how to follow a thread and making intelligible comments?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @josephw
Do you have any misconceptions about how to follow a thread and making intelligible comments?
No.
Now answer my question.


Originally posted by @josephw
No. I mean apart from your misconceptions about God.
Not sure sir how you can say that with a straight face, bearing in mind the God of the OT is not only petty and jealous, but extremely needy.

If God doesn't need anything, what pray tell is the root cause of his jealousy?!

(I don't think you thought this through).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @josephw
I pity your wife.
Perhaps his wife has a sense of humour. 🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @eladar
According to the creation account in Genesis God created woman by taking something from man. Men have both X and Y chromosomes. Women have only one of those chromosomes.

God taking an X out of man then replicating it would be consistent with the creation account.

Is it proof positive? Of course not, but it is interesting how a story from such ancient times fits in such a way.
Every cell in a rib has one X and one Y. If another human was created from a rib, then it should be a clone with the same gender.

No, the 'proof' is not positive. It's a guessing from a desperate person desperately wanting the creation to be the truth.

Does the bible tell why elephants has a trunk? No? Because that proof is also a fable.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Who said God needed, just that he did.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fabianfnas
Every cell in a rib has one X and one Y. If another human was created from a rib, then it should be a clone with the same gender.

No, the 'proof' is not positive. It's a guessing from a desperate person desperately wanting the creation to be the truth.

Does the bible tell why elephants has a trunk? No? Because that proof is also a fable.
Who said that God used all of the chromosomes? How could he use the chromosome he created for being male if he wanted a female? He obviously had to fix the problem by getting rid of the x and doubling the y.


Originally posted by @eladar
According to the creation account in Genesis God created woman by taking something from man. Men have both X and Y chromosomes. Women have only one of those chromosomes.

God taking an X out of man then replicating it would be consistent with the creation account.

Is it proof positive? Of course not, but it is interesting how a story from such ancient times fits in such a way.
The more I read this forum and posts like these the harder it gets for me to remain an atheist.

I mean, just LOOK at how it all fits together.

It's really too convincing to casually dismiss.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @eladar
Who said God needed, just that he did.
So he (god) did it needlessly.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
So he (god) did it needlessly.
Needlessly? To actually create? Yes

Evidently God had another reason to create woman from man.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @eladar
Needlessly? To actually create? Yes

Evidently God had another reason to create woman from man.
Well the FSM had a need to create idiots .. I don't know why.
But evidently He did.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @eladar
According to the creation account in Genesis God created woman by taking something from man. Men have both X and Y chromosomes. Women have only one of those chromosomes.

God taking an X out of man then replicating it would be consistent with the creation account.

Is it proof positive? Of course not, but it is interesting how a story from such ancient times fits in such a way.
Also, my X gave me the boot and I have no idea as to Y.

Coincidence?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @great-king-rat
The more I read this forum and posts like these the harder it gets for me to remain an atheist.

I mean, just LOOK at how it all fits together.

It's really too convincing to casually dismiss.
Also, the number 6 is said to be the number of man in the Bible. Any idea what number carbon is on the periodic table again?

Ha! Now the conversion is complete. Resistance is futile.


Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Not sure sir how you can say that with a straight face, bearing in mind the God of the OT is not only petty and jealous, but extremely needy.

If God doesn't need anything, what pray tell is the root cause of his jealousy?!

(I don't think you thought this through).
(I don't think you thought this through).

But you have? Do you seriously think I can answer questions from you about the nature of a being you deny the existence of?

I think that if I really thought it through I would at this point just walk away. It's like looking at the ocean with someone that's trying to tell me that water isn't wet knowing they know it is.

Atheism is a defunct mindset held by those with an innate sense of self importance in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Yet they persist in denying what their gut is telling them is true to the extent that their mind becomes so over clouded with lies they wouldn't know the truth about their creator even if it ran them over like a bulldozer.

Their only hope is if God should grant them repentance.

(You better think it through)