1 edit
@bigdogg saidOK; here are my views:
Only if you do not repent of them before you die. But don't wait. You could be hit by a car tomorrow!
A Catholic priest and a rabbi are seated next to each other on an airplane; they converse.
Priest: Rabbi, are you still required to abstain from pork?
Rabbi: Oh yes, and many other things as well.
Priest: I see.
Rabbi: Father, are Catholic priests still required to be celibate?
Priest: Oh yes. (Long pause; then: ) Rabbi, were you ever tempted to break your vow?
Rabbi: Yes, I am forced to confess that I once indulged in sinfulness. (Long pause. Then: ) Father, were you ever tempted to break your vow?
Priest: Yes, I am forced to confess that I once indulged in sinfulness.
Rabbi: Well, sure beats a ham sandwich.
Am I in?
1 edit
@eladar saidQuite right. The term "Christisnity" means nothing. I couldn't agree more.
The term Christisnity means nothing.
There are only those going to hell and those who are not.
Oh yeah, I forgot people around here believe they have thoughtful conversation lol.
There are those already living in their own self-made hells and those who are not.
"Hell is: other people." Jean-Paul Sartre
you guys making fun of @eledar for being unable to spell even tho he claims to ba a teacher
that's just not right
lookie here, break it down, "Christ is nity"
this only stands to reason as back in the day folks had very little they could do th control head lice
no ivermectin to squirt in they butts
thus nits
you go @eledar
wave that nit flag
@moonbus saidAre you the Priest, or the Rabbi?
OK; here are my views:
A Catholic priest and a rabbi are seated next to each other on an airplane; they converse.
Priest: Rabbi, are you still required to abstain from pork?
Rabbi: Oh yes, and many other things as well.
Priest: I see.
Rabbi: Father, are Catholic priests still required to be celibate?
Priest: Oh yes. (Long pause; then: ) Rabbi, were you eve ...[text shortened]... nfess that I once indulged in sinfulness.
Rabbi: Well, sure beats a ham sandwich.
Am I in?
@bigdogg saidI like what you are saying, and some religions have slaughtered by the tens of thousands (if not more) because some didn't do it "their way".
There is one correct version of Christianity. Fact.
Naturally, it's my version, or perhaps less blatantly egotistical, the version I happen to follow.
If you're not doing it like me, you're doing it wrong.
Speaking as somebody born into Catholicism who rejected it, the people who have enforced this approach don't know their own writings.
Or is it that they have used religion for political purposes?
@medullah saidOther people must use their religion for political purposes, to make up for the lack of God on their side. Me and mine use our religion solely for divine purposes.
I like what you are saying, and some religions have slaughtered by the tens of thousands (if not more) because some didn't do it "their way".
Speaking as somebody born into Catholicism who rejected it, the people who have enforced this approach don't know their own writings.
Or is it that they have used religion for political purposes?
There are both warlike and peaceful passages in the scripture, but only we use them at the appropriate times. The rest twist the scriptures to suit their own mood.
1 edit
@bigdogg saidSo, I'm not a "correct" Christian. Oh well, there are plenty of other religions to choose from. One of them is bound to have cucumber sandwiches.
All 3 of you sound like perverts.
Yer out!
PS You can keep the Lake of Fire; that bit sucks.