Originally posted by RJHindsIn your own words I'd like you to justify the first sentence of the post I'm replying to.
Evolution has never been observed in nature. So the question should be...
Where does the intelligent input come from that leads evolutionists to believe evolution is an observed fact of nature?
The Holy Bible tells us that it comes from God. Modern science gives only speculation or nothing. Evolutionists certainly do not provide any answers to life questions because they continually say that is for someone else to figure out.
Originally posted by DeepThoughtI think he's referring to the part of evolution that attempts to explain descent from a common ancestor (such as the first living thing) by using similarity of body types and lining them up in such a way that it appears creatures have progressed up a chain of increasing complexity. This sounds like magnificent story telling, but I think RJ is saying there is no hard evidence showing this actually happened. And in light of evidence* showing how it couldn't have happened I'm inclined to agree with him.
In your own words I'd like you to justify the first sentence of the post I'm replying to.
*Aaaack, no! Don't get suckered into looking at new evidence!
Originally posted by DeepThoughtI justify it by my own experience. I have never observed actual evolution and I have not seen any evidence that anyone else has either. We only see imaginary evolution that is depicted in drawings and graphic videos like cartoon fairy tales for grownups like the following.
In your own words I'd like you to justify the first sentence of the post I'm replying to.
- Joined
- 31 Aug 06
- Moves
- 40565
Originally posted by RJHindsYou want to see real evidence? Go to a museum with fossils on display. Analyse DNA and try to put species in order of similarities and see what you get. Look at ERVs and again put DNA in order of shared ERVs, and see what you get. Of course, attacking videos meant to make science easy for the layman to understand is easier. It's swinging in the air though, while the rest of us stand back, either laughing our asses off or feeling embarrassed for you (depending on individual character I suppose).
I justify it by my own experience. I have never observed actual evolution and I have not seen any evidence that anyone else has either. We only see imaginary evolution that is depicted in drawings and graphic videos like cartoon fairy tales for grownups like the following.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W763lQR0tU
Originally posted by C Hess
You want to see real evidence? Go to a museum with fossils on display. Analyse DNA and try to put species in order of similarities and see what you get. Look at ERVs and again put DNA in order of shared ERVs, and see what you get. Of course, attacking videos meant to make science easy for the layman to understand is easier. It's swinging in the air though, wh ...[text shortened]... hing our asses off or feeling embarrassed for you (depending on individual character I suppose).
Originally posted by C HessFossils are just bones.
You want to see real evidence? Go to a museum with fossils on display. Analyse DNA and try to put species in order of similarities and see what you get. Look at ERVs and again put DNA in order of shared ERVs, and see what you get. Of course, attacking videos meant to make science easy for the layman to understand is easier. It's swinging in the air though, wh ...[text shortened]... hing our asses off or feeling embarrassed for you (depending on individual character I suppose).
- Joined
- 31 Aug 06
- Moves
- 40565
Originally posted by RJHindsSome fossils are made to look like bones? You're not even making sense. And what about all the fossils that aren't fossilised bones at all, like imprints of ancient organisms? How is an imprint of an organism a bone?
Some are bones and some are just made to look like bones. 😏
And still, I have to ask, your point?
1 edit
Originally posted by C HessI was not referring to an imprint. I was referring to the real skeletal remains that have been fossilized. The point is that one can not tell if a fossilized bone was ever the evolutionary ancestor of anything.
Some fossils are made to look like bones? You're not even making sense. And what about all the fossils that aren't fossilised bones at all, like imprints of ancient organisms? How is an imprint of an organism a bone?
And still, I have to ask, your point?
Originally posted by RJHindsWell YOU can't for sure. Biologists can CERTAINLY tell if one fossil is related to another. Now you are just being stupid, making nonsense statements like that. You are your own worse enemy.
I was not referring to an imprint. I was referring to the real skeletal remains that have been fossilized. The point is that one can not tell if a fossilized bone was ever the evolutionary ancestor of anything.
Originally posted by sonhouseI am glad to see that you are beginning to understand that this fossil evolution is a bunch of nonsense. You are making some progress on understanding the truth. However it is evolution that is stupid. Do you want me to point out a video showing how stupid?
Well YOU can't for sure. Biologists can CERTAINLY tell if one fossil is related to another. Now you are just being stupid, making nonsense statements like that. You are your own worse enemy.
- Joined
- 31 Aug 06
- Moves
- 40565
Originally posted by RJHindsThe fossils used to verify evolution are all fossils. And the fossils are only a small part of the evidence for evolution. What they demonstrate, when you put them in chronological order is a gradual change in populations over many generations, exactly as evolutionary theory predicts. Now, you can attack the assumption that the fossils appear in chronological order, but then you have to explain why fossils appear in such an order. If a worldwide flood wiped all these organisms out, you'd expect to find them all jumbled up. We shouldn't find neat layers, with some organisms placed only in some layers and other organisms placed only in other layers, if a worldwide flood wiped them out. Who felt the need, and took the time to neatly arrange all the fossils such that they appear to tell the story of evolution over time, and why?
I am glad to see that you are beginning to understand that this fossil evolution is a bunch of nonsense. You are making some progress on understanding the truth. However it is evolution that is stupid. Do you want me to point out a video showing how stupid?