26 Mar 06
Originally posted by sonhouseI entered 2 songs into the music compitition, But Starman forgot to put it on the list, He offered to put it on list ofter the voting started, but I told him I'll wait for the next one. Yea I play Bluegrass. Just got home from a 5 week tour
If I only knew what? BTW I see your profile says you play banjo and guitar. Ever think of entering a number or two in the music competition? I am going out on a limb here and making the assumption you play bluegrass, right?
http://www.atnipfamily.com/14%20Track%2014.mp3
BTW, I meant if you only knew how many missing links there are. And how your "missing link" is still missing
26 Mar 06
Originally posted by sonhouseCreationists are not modern humans. They oppose modernism, preferring medieval theology and pre-scientific culture.
Now the last argument you have is crumbling before your eyes: No missing link to modern humans. Well there is one now. I feel sorry for your loss.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
26 Mar 06
Originally posted by sonhouseThe last argument?
Now the last argument you have is crumbling before your eyes: No missing link to modern humans. Well there is one now. I feel sorry for your loss.
Missing link?
Our loss?
What on earth are you talking about?
Oh I see... The Nebraskan man...
26 Mar 06
Originally posted by dj2beckerYep, you poor creationists are running out of argument space. Your outmoded "theories" are doomed to fail. Of course that won't stop you from yelling, 'unfair', 'it's not over'.
The last argument?
Missing link?
Our loss?
What on earth are you talking about?
Oh I see... The Nebraskan man...
26 Mar 06
Originally posted by dj2beckerWhy do creationists always hark on about Nebraska man? That was shown to be false over 80 years ago. Piltdown was shown to be false over 50 years ago.
The last argument?
Missing link?
Our loss?
What on earth are you talking about?
Oh I see... The Nebraskan man...
Guess what? Science makes mistakes sometimes. Why? Because people do science. The mistakes tend to be in the detail rather than the general thrust though. Why do we make mistakes in the detail? Because it's hard to juggle 100 or so facts to make a coherent paper, without any errors whatsoever.
Useful web links though;
http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars/2006/3/26/3341
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060326/NEWS06/603260424/1006/NEWS01
An older link to 2003...
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s877478.htm
26 Mar 06
Originally posted by WulebgrWhat about that guy, forget the time or place, but he observed some mice coming out of some rags and declared he had solved the puzzle of life, saying it was 'Spontaneous emission' or something like that.
All their arguments are straw men because that is all they have.
Remember that theory? Kind of an alchemy of life thing.
26 Mar 06
Originally posted by sonhouseI heard about that guy from Creationists. Makes my point exactly.
What about that guy, forget the time or place, but he observed some mice coming out of some rags and declared he had solved the puzzle of life, saying it was 'Spontaneous emission' or something like that.
Remember that theory? Kind of an alchemy of life thing.
26 Mar 06
Originally posted by sonhouseWhy don't you defend the reason you even started this thread rather than making general statements that anyone can do?
Yep, you poor creationists are running out of argument space. Your outmoded "theories" are doomed to fail. Of course that won't stop you from yelling, 'unfair', 'it's not over'.