His poor physical health was well-known and he even returned for a short while as I recall and spoke about it himself. No reason to bring him into this discussion.
@dj2beckersaid Who am I trolling by asking what illness GP B has?
You are trying to troll me by suggesting that the reason Grampy Bobby stopped contributing to this site was caused by something other than his serious illness. You really ought to be ashamed of yourself and think hard about who has duped you.
@fmfsaid You are trying to troll me by suggesting that the reason Grampy Bobby stopped contributing to this site was caused by something other than his serious illness. You really ought to be ashamed of yourself and think hard about who has duped you.
@divegeestersaid Thank you for the translation. However I still don’t understand it within the context of your use of it to reply to my tongue-in-cheek post on the previous page?
fmf said:
Romans1009 has been banned, so in his case it's moot. I have been here for 12 years and he was one of a kind. While your suggested precautions are wise - and to a degree some of that was being implemented these last few months - the kind of thing Romans1009 did has been very rare in this community and it's not very likely to happen again.
moonbus said:
Let us hope you are right, that it won't happen again. However, eternal vigilance is the price we all pay to keep an open Internet open.
dive said:
When you say “eternal” are you being literal? (+ tongue-in-cheek emojis)
moonbus said:
Unrelenting. […is maybe an improvement over "eternal"]
@moonbussaid fmf said:
Romans1009 has been banned, so in his case it's moot. I have been here for 12 years and he was one of a kind. While your suggested precautions are wise - and to a degree some of that was being implemented these last few months - the kind of thing Romans1009 did has been very rare in this community and it's not very likely to happen again.
moonbus said:
Let us ...[text shortened]...
moonbus said:
Unrelenting. […is maybe an improvement over "eternal"]