14 Feb '06 22:22>
Originally posted by HalitoseI think evolution is as much a philosophy as it is a scientific theory.
I think evolution is as much a philosophy as it is a scientific theory.
So the root of an issue should never be discussed? Should Marx be left out of the actions of Stalin? Should Nietzsche and his Übermensch be left unconnected from Nazi ideology? Just because the likes of Herbert Spencer and Thomas Malthus perfected/perverted Darwin's thought int ...[text shortened]... rather that discussing a matter objectively, you just want to sweep it all under the carpet.
Quite simply, you are wrong. It is clear that your use of "philosophy" here implies, at least in part, some mechanism that gives rise to normative conclusions. But the "root" of a normative conclusion is always a normative premise; you simply cannot argue in a logically valid way from purely descriptive claims to a normative conclusion. Since evolutionary theory is nothing more than a collection of descriptive claims about how the world may operate, it cannot be the "root" of any prescriptive conclusion. The best you can hope for is to show that the evil persons of which you speak (e.g., the Nazis) were guilty of committing (among other things) the Naturalistic Fallacy.
_____________________________________________________________________________
"In every system of morality, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remark'd, that the author proceeds for some time in the ordinary ways of reasoning, and establishes the being of a God, or makes observations concerning human affairs; when of a sudden I am surpriz'd to find, that instead of the usual copulations of propositions, is, and is not, I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not. This change is imperceptible; but is however, of the last consequence. For as this ought, or ought not, expresses some new relation or affirmation, 'tis necessary that it shou'd be observ'd and explain'd; and at the same time that a reason should be given; for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others, which are entirely different from it"
--David Hume