Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Oh c'mon. There's no "proof" either way. In my mind it's foolish to make either assertion as definite.
Realistically, the "explanation" is based on ignorance. "This is outside the current understanding of the mind, so it must not be true". The understand of the mind is in its infancy.
Read my post again. I wasn't talking about evidence for the soul, I was talking about being able to explain what it was. Despite numerous attempts on these forums and elsewhere, I am yet to find a Christian who can give a rigorous definition of what he means by the soul. The best attempts have resulted in a definition of a non-conscious entity or at most, an entity that does not continue our consciousness after death.
It is simply incoherent to talk about the existence or nonexistence of an entity that you have not defined. Its as stupid as the people who go around saying "You cant disprove the existence of God because you don't have infinite knowledge, so God might be somewhere you didn't look." What they are really saying, without realizing it, is that they have not defined God and he might in fact be a little green bunny on a dusty planet on the far side of the universe.
I challenge you, or anyone else who thinks that there is an entity called the soul, to give a definition, at least list some of its properties.
For example:
1. Is it conscious?
2. Is its consciousness separate from ours?
3. If we go mad, does it go mad too?
4. Does its consciousness extend from ours after death?
5. Does it have our memories?
6. If we loose memories, does it loose them too?
7. Without the physical body, can it see, feel, hear etc?
8. Can it experience emotions? Keep in mind here that our emotions are driven at least in part, by the chemistry of the body.