18 Jun '11 20:12>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI guess you saw the implied sarcasm. My basic argument is this: Science can change its opinion and verifiable facts with newer knowledge. You are utterly unable to change your stance. I can change my stance when further knowledge might come in to convince us a god is about and actually did all the things you think it did. Until such a time, I'll stick with what is currently known. You, poor thing, are stuck in your own set of delusions and cannot even peek outside of them to consider other data. You peek only to find inconsistencies that will support your claims, which of course aren't even yours but thrashed over concepts that were not even original to christianity but plagiarised from earlier equally preposterous tales meant to control men and subjugate women. You are being controlled most excellently.
'soup', that has to be the best, utterly hilarious. I laugh at it every time.