10 Oct '10 22:59>
It strikes me that the people that argue vociferously against evolution strike many of the similar notes as the people who argue against human-induced climate change.
I wonder what the perspective of religious people is on climate change?
On evolution, I come back to a question I asked some years ago, which never seemed to be answered terribly well - what is the problem? Why does one scientific model seem to create such angst and anguish?
And I might add, why do no others create the same angst?
Contrary to some posters beliefs evolutionary biologists are not operating any differently to any other scientists. Yet some of you accept without question the models we construct that describe atoms or radiation or gravity or many others. What's the problem with this one other?
I wonder what the perspective of religious people is on climate change?
On evolution, I come back to a question I asked some years ago, which never seemed to be answered terribly well - what is the problem? Why does one scientific model seem to create such angst and anguish?
And I might add, why do no others create the same angst?
Contrary to some posters beliefs evolutionary biologists are not operating any differently to any other scientists. Yet some of you accept without question the models we construct that describe atoms or radiation or gravity or many others. What's the problem with this one other?