Originally posted by @dj2beckerHe's been asked this before. He couldn't or wouldn't say then, either.
What are you then?
Originally posted by @suzianneWhat is it you see yourself doing when you say to divegeester something along the lines of what you say in the above comment and do so hundreds of times every year, year after year? Is it an example of you "stating your case and moving on"?
The difference here is that you cannot just state your case and move on, you have to verbally thrash people over and over and over and over, across many threads, JUST for the 'high crime' of disagreeing with you.
Originally posted by @suzianne to @divegeesterNever mind, I see exactly where you get it from.
The difference here is that you cannot just state your case and move on, you have to verbally thrash people over and over and over and over, across many threads, JUST for the 'high crime' of disagreeing with you.
Originally posted by @suzianneYou aim the same little scornful off-topic spake at me too, hundreds and hundreds of times too. Don't you ever pause for thought and wonder whether the way you behave in repeatedly reprimanding divegeester in the same way, for the same reason, regardless of the topic, ad nauseam, might perhaps be making you seem a bit hypocritical?
Never mind, I see exactly where you get it from.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIf man was truly honest with himself (or herself) and boldly embraced "I don't know," they would be spared the whole botheration of having to invent a deity to provide reassuring answers.
His go to words for questions he doesn't want to answer seem to be "I don't know".
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYea, I agree those deities we invent worthless.
If man was truly honest with himself (or herself) and boldly embraced "I don't know," they would be spared the whole botheration of having to invent a deity to provide reassuring answers.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerNo wonder we don't get along.
It would explain a lot if he was a Unitarian Universalist.
I'm a Bitarian Galaxian.