Do numbers lie?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
It's not apples and oranges, analysis of correspondence chess world championship matches (pre chess engines) still fall below the engine match-up thresholds.

The simple fact you don't recognise is that humans do not play like machines as former mod Gatecrasher put quite eloquently in a post a while back -

Strong humans and computers play ...[text shortened]... ka or Fritz. And then there are those who, for want of a better word, are cheats.

You do not say how you chose the twenty games or even know how
they compare with any of my other games. I know for a fact that I
made one big blunder in one of my games and resigned immediately
it was so bad. Perhaps I had 90% matchup on that game too. Who
knows?

Originally posted by RJHinds
You do not say how you chose the twenty games or even know how
they compare with any of my other games. I know for a fact that I
made one big blunder in one of my games and resigned immediately
it was so bad. Perhaps I had 90% matchup on that game too. Who
knows?

I selected the last 20 games you played against 2000+ rated opposition that had 20+ moves out of book. In all a 719 move sample.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I selected the last 20 games you played against 2000+ rated opposition that had 20+ moves out of book. In all a 719 move sample.

The only reason you have been checking on me as that ever since I came
on here I have challenged your ridiculous beliefs in atheism and evolution
and made you look like a fool. You are also jealous that I am doing better
in the chess, admit it. You are not checking the last twenty games of the
top ranked players, only me. Is that because I speak up for Christianity
and against your religion of atheism and evolution? I think that is why
you are not being fair to me and are leaving the top rated players alone.
They have made no challenge to your intelligence or religion as I have,
right?

Originally posted by RJHinds
The only reason you have been checking on me as that ever since I came
on here I have challenged your ridiculous beliefs in atheism and evolution
and made you look like a fool. You are also jealous that I am doing better
in the chess, admit it. You are not checking the last twenty games of the
top ranked players, only me. Is that because I speak up f ...[text shortened]... players alone.
They have made no challenge to your intelligence or religion as I have,
right?

I think people have been checking your games because you appear to be breaking the TOS.

Originally posted by RJHinds
The only reason you have been checking on me as that ever since I came
on here I have challenged your ridiculous beliefs in atheism and evolution
and made you look like a fool. You are also jealous that I am doing better
in the chess, admit it. You are not checking the last twenty games of the
top ranked players, only me. Is that because I speak up f ...[text shortened]... players alone.
They have made no challenge to your intelligence or religion as I have,
right?

You are not checking the last twenty games of the top ranked players, only me.

You sure about that? Your numbers haven't just been run by me, someone else has got nearly the same figures.

As for the rest of that post. Give it a rest.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
[b]You are not checking the last twenty games of the top ranked players, only me.

You sure about that? Your numbers haven't just been run by me, someone else has got nearly the same figures.

As for the rest of that post. Give it a rest.[/b]

I posted the following on the science forum to help some of those that
have been misguided by the evolutionists crowd:

"Now that science knows that the universe must of had a beginning,
doesn't it make more sense to you that some intelligence must have
created it to work in such order and precision, than for some "big Bang"
to have produced it? Just think about how the earth, moon, and sun are
just at the right distances apart and moving at the right speeds, etc. to
make a home for life as we know it. It does not make sense to me that
this just happened by accident. Because of all the details listed within
the pages of the Holy Scriptures about life and the operation of our
universe that seem unlikely that ancient man to have understanding of,
I believe there is something to the Biblical account of a Creator God.
And the alternative that life came about by the accidental production of
small particles that formed themselves over time into machines that
came alive and produced all other living things seems as crazy as thinking
that a Mercedes Benz automobile assembled itself. And the idea that my
ancestors were apes of some type is not too appealing."

Barts said,

"It's pure chance. There are millions and millions of planets, it's no wonder that some of them will be able to sustain life. It's like flipping coins, you might call 100 heads in a row a miracle, but everyone with half a brain can tell you that if you throw enough coins, that's bound to happen sometime.

Another problem with your theory is " to make a home for life as we know it". Life as we know it evolved to best suit the environment, so it's only natural that this planet is a good place for us to live."

Then I responed with,

"It's hard for me to believe that there are so many people, who think they are
very intelligent, that believe the same stupid things you just wrote. You need
to stand back away from them and start thinking for yourself and I am sure
you must have enough intelligence to realize how unreasonable it is for life
and everything else just happened by chance alone. Like I said before,
you would not believe a Mercedes Benz automobile just happened by chance
would you? Then why believe something even more complex like living
creatures would happen by chance. Thank man! That is why God created
you with a brain."

This is why you want to shut me up and get me banned from RHP. I tell the truth
about the religion of atheism and evolution. You don't like that. I don't need
RHP. But there are many people on this forum who need to know the truth about
atheism and evolution and someone like myself needs to tell them about the Savior
of the world. That is my purpose. I am not here to make friends or to win Chess
games. It would not matter to me is I ever played another game on RHP there are
other places to play chess. You need someone like me to wake you up before it is
too late.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I posted the following on the science forum to help some of those that
have been misguided by the evolutionists crowd:

"Now that science knows that the universe must of had a beginning,
doesn't it make more sense to you that some intelligence must have
created it to work in such order and precision, than for some "big Bang"
to have produced it? Jus ...[text shortened]... play chess. You need someone like me to wake you up before it is
too late.

You're dodging the key question that has been posed to you. As someone asked earlier, how come you have significantly higher engine matchup rates than the current world number 1, and for that matter every world champion there has ever been? What would you put that down to?

Originally posted by RJHinds
You say that I [b]"parade around the forums spreading ... ignorant drivel
and calling people liars without cause". I spread intelligent drivel and
when I call people liars it is not without a cause. In my opinion it is you
that are guilty of what you have charged me.

As for numbers, I do not know what the numbers stand for or if they are
true ...[text shortened]... to explain them. Like Huckleberry Finn, I don't take much
stock in them.

With Love,
Ron[/b]

Remind me again as to the lies that FMF told. You can argue that someone who disagrees with you is wrong, but it is dishonest to call them liers.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I posted the following on the science forum to help some of those that
have been misguided by the evolutionists crowd:

"Now that science knows that the universe must of had a beginning,
doesn't it make more sense to you that some intelligence must have
created it to work in such order and precision, than for some "big Bang"
to have produced it? Jus ...[text shortened]... play chess. You need someone like me to wake you up before it is
too late.

What does the theory of evolution have to do with your engine match up rates?!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
What does the theory of evolution have to do with your engine match up rates?!

They are both a bunch of nonsense. 😏

Originally posted by FMF
You're dodging the key question that has been posed to you. As someone asked earlier, how come you have significantly higher engine matchup rates than the current world number 1, and for that matter every world champion there has ever been? What would you put that down to?

Dasa says, "*To ask baiting questions is dishonest."
😏

Originally posted by FMF
I think people have been checking your games because you appear to be breaking the TOS.

Dasa says, "* To guess and speculate and fabricate is dishonest."

😏

Originally posted by deenny
Remind me again as to the lies that FMF told. You can argue that someone who disagrees with you is wrong, but it is dishonest to call them liers.

That is not one of Dasa rules for being dishonest. 😏

Originally posted by deenny
Remind me again as to the lies that FMF told. You can argue that someone who disagrees with you is wrong, but it is dishonest to call them liers.

That is not one of Dasa rules for being dishonest. 😏

Some guy who I am playing chess just accused me of cheating !

Like I knew how to use a chess engine if I had one.
And the guy is winning the game too.