Do numbers lie?

Well do they RJ?

Originally posted by usmc7257
Well do they RJ?

Oops. Talk about 'bang to rights'! I think the contempt RJHinds shows towards people in his approach to chess on this site is - psychologically speaking - part and parcel of the contempt he shows towards people in this Spirituality Forum community. Both instances of contempt seem utterly pointless, too.

Originally posted by FMF
Oops. Talk about 'bang to rights'! I think the contempt RJHinds shows towards people in his approach to chess on this site is - psychologically speaking - part and parcel of the contempt he shows towards people in this Spirituality Forum community. Both instances of contempt seem utterly pointless, too.

RJ does nothing but take. He has nothing noteworthy to contribute. Since he regurgitates things he has read from ridiculous sources off the internet, it would be an easy transition to regurgitate certain moves another program tells him he should.


Fritz 4-12 Thou shalt take the Top 4 matches...

"Lies, damned lies, and statistics"

Originally posted by usmc7257
Well do they RJ?

Nope don't lie, but they can mislead.
Kelly

Originally posted by twhitehead
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics"

I wonder if RJ has read any Mark Twain.

Originally posted by usmc7257
I wonder if RJ has read any Mark Twain.

Yes, I read only "Huckleberry Finn" and I remember he got all worked up
over the Bible stories until he found out the people were dead. He did not
take much stock in dead people.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, I read only "Huckleberry Finn" and I remember he got all worked up
over the Bible stories until he found out the people were dead. He did not
take much stock in dead people.

How about addressing the problem at hand

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, I read only "Huckleberry Finn" and I remember he got all worked up
over the Bible stories until he found out the people were dead. He did not
take much stock in dead people.

Did he play chess do you think?

Originally posted by usmc7257
How about addressing the problem at hand

What is your problem?

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
Did he play chess do you think?

Nope, too dumb for that. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
What is your problem?

I have no problem. YOU have the problem the world misunderstands your genius. I'm sure you have seen the numbers. Do you care to explain them, or avoid them? They don't look good, or perhaps they look TOO good, whichever way you would like to see it.

If it seems like I am picking on you, you will have to understand where I am coming from. I think the way you parade around the forums spreading your ignorant drivel and calling people liars without cause is ridiculous, especially when you are not being truthful yourself.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Nope, too dumb for that. 😏

Really? 6 more positions and you will be on page 1

HalleluYAH

Originally posted by usmc7257
Well do they RJ?

There was a man who could calculate numbers faster than a computer and everyone respected him as a great and wonderful man because he could do that............but behind closed doors this man was unhappy.

He could not maintain relationships - he could not cook - he could not enjoy normal social settings - he was depressed........................but he was a whiz with numbers.

People who are good with mathematics are good at mathematics................but mathematics will not stop birth, disease, old age and death and suffering.

Good luck with your mathematics.

And maybe there is a spot in the circus between the juggler and the acrobats for demonstrating how good you are at mathematics.

The kids shall prefer the clowns though.

Originally posted by Dasa
............but mathematics will not stop birth, disease, old age and death and suffering.

Funny how you typed that on a computer. Remember the word 'computer' comes from 'compute' ie, to work with numbers.