Originally posted by KellyJay
I don't think so, someone making their case does not mean it was proven
only that the case has been made by them. I do believe that is the issue
with some here, they believe once they present their side of the story than
nothing more needs to be done, then after that anyone who disagrees must
be out to lunch or a liar of some sort.
It is of course true that simply presenting your case doesn't mean that you are correct.
Unless your case is a logically valid sound argument based on the available facts and
is sufficiently justified to qualify as proven to whatever agreed upon standard is
required.
I am not saying that people have claimed that the god of the bible has been proven*
not to exist.
I am saying it has been proven that the god of the bible does not exist.
*
beyond any and all reasonable doubt, to a statistical certainty, not an epistemological
one.
And my main point is that the relevant information and reason is out there, but you
wont find it if you bury your head in the sand.
And you cannot honestly claim it doesn't exist when you [Suzianne] run away any time
someone tries to actually take you through it.
In the same way that you cannot honestly claim that evolution isn't supported by evidence
when you ignore all attempts by people to show you all the evidence you deny exists.
You are at that point demonstrating will-full ignorance.