07 Jan '09 22:09>
Originally posted by whodeyThe topic at hand in this thread is if people view certain activity whether sexual in nature or otherwise, as an abomination in the eyes of God and proclaim it as such to the masses does that constitute hate speech? If so, the religious will be outlawed from declaring any human activity an abomination in the eyes of God.
Whether or not homosexuality is an "abomination" in the sight of God is not the topic of this thread. The topic at hand in this thread is if people view certain activity whether sexual in nature or otherwise, as an abomination in the eyes of God and proclaim it as such to the masses does that constitute hate speech? If so, the religious will be outlawed fro ...[text shortened]... God of the Bible does not always explain himself. If you don't believe me just read Job.
----------------------whodey----------------------
I think it makes a lot of difference actually. If someone were to pour out a lot of scorn and condemnation against terrorists , paedophiles, etc then it probably wouldn't sound as bad because naturally we all (apart from the very twisted) see these things as "abominable".
Thus the hatespeech towards paedophiles might seem appropriate (I personally think hatespeech of any kind is just not useful). If something is deemed morally abominable by huge swathes of society then speaking out aginst it is unlikely to be seen as hateful. I'm sure many non-religious people would be glad to see paedophiles in hell , even if they are not sure if they believe in it.
Homosexuals though? Hmmm different matter. Much of our moral outrage against padeophilia is about the immeasurable harm that is done to very vulnerable children. When fundies talk about homsexuality as if it is equivalent it sounds so much more hateful. It sounds irrational infact , why , because the listener is unable to find any reason for such hate other than "it says so in some book".
I think the religious can declare any activity an abomination if they like , what they need to be able to do however is justify such talk with a rationale of some kind that resonates with the rest of society's conscience. Otherwise such bold hatespeech just sounds like rabid nonsense based on blind faith.
How far do you go with such thinking? If God declares cheese sandwiches an "abomination" then do you question it - or just say "well God must have his reasons"? My first thought would be to question the sanity of the person who wrote down what God had "said".