Even science believes in creation.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
What about coordinates? Dod you forget those? Are you now inclined that the creationsts teaching that you believe in is wrong? (Creationists rhetorics.)

You try to draw attention from the fact that you don't know the place where the first living cell was created, and thus that the creationism in whole is wrong.

I'm not here to discuss nitty gritty a ...[text shortened]... s it in another thread.

Now we're talking of you don't knowing creationism basicalities.

Okay. If I give you the coordinates, which I will have to look up
will you believe me?

Originally posted by RJHinds
Okay. If I give you the coordinates, which I will have to look up
will you believe me?

I will believe you if you give me the truth. You lose respect if you trying to lie to me.

If you value respect, then you give me the truth. If you don't give a damn, then you try to lie and hope I'll never find out.

But as you accepted the challenge and fail, will you then admit the whole story of creationism is wrong? Will you then become a true evolutionist?

I expect that your next posting will have the coordinates, or I will think that you avoid the question altogether. You will then lose face, and all credibility. The creationism will stand lower than ever.

Okay?

Originally posted by FabianFnas
I will believe you if you give me the truth. You lose respect if you trying to lie to me.

If you value respect, then you give me the truth. If you don't give a damn, then you try to lie and hope I'll never find out.

But as you accepted the challenge and fail, will you then admit the whole story of creationism is wrong? Will you then become a true e ...[text shortened]... will then lose face, and all credibility. The creationism will stand lower than ever.

Okay?

Latitude 6.633
Longitude -58.183

Originally posted by RJHinds
Latitude 6.633
Longitude -58.183

Doesn't say anything. What source do you have for this fantastic scientific breaktrough? Or did you invent it yourself?

You say that you have the coordinates where the first living cell was created. But you cannot back it up. Does this mean that you admit that creationist turths are not more than lies? You cannot answer the simplest question about the creation, yet you say that you have all the answers, no more is to be known, because you know it all. Is this what is called to be a honest christian?

You lose respect, RJHinds, you lose respect. And not only you, but everyone that agrees with you. You set a level of rhetorics, a low level, and by this prove that your creationistic arguments are not much worth.

Do I need to offer you one more chance? Or have we at last established the fact that creationism is not more than an illusion?

Originally posted by Nicksten
FabianFnas - Firstly you forgot to take in to consideration that I did say [b]try (in brackets) - By simply saying there are two different answers from the same religion does not proof that we can not decide among ourselves because it wasn't such a exercise.

I can use the same "retorics" to say that science is totally false as some scientists said t ...[text shortened]... y don't agree with each other thus there is no truth in science. You see the fail in this???[/b]

Really? REALLY? You think a finding that something moves faster than light destroys the credibility of science? Does the fact that a bullet shot from a gun has enough kinetic energy to smash through most windows get destroyed because of a *possible* finding, not yet corroborated, of neutrino's going faster than life?

Talk about grabbing at straws........

Originally posted by sonhouse
Really? REALLY? You think a finding that something moves faster than light destroys the credibility of science? Does the fact that a bullet shot from a gun has enough kinetic energy to smash through most windows get destroyed because of a *possible* finding, not yet corroborated, of neutrino's going faster than life?

Talk about grabbing at straws........

Actually I posted quite a long and detailed rebuttal at how this incident demonstrates the
power and beauty of the scientific method... to which I have obviously had no response.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Actually I posted quite a long and detailed rebuttal at how this incident demonstrates the
power and beauty of the scientific method... to which I have obviously had no response.

Creationists don't know much about science.

One creationist rule about science might look like this:
Question: Does this law of phýsics violates creationism?
Yes: Then it is wrong.
No: Perhaps creationism can use it for some purpous.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Creationists don't know much about science.

One creationist rule about science might look like this:
Question: Does this law of phýsics violates creationism?
Yes: Then it is wrong.
No: Perhaps creationism can use it for some purpous.

All the laws of Physics support creationism and none of the laws of
Phsysics violate the young earth creationism. I dare you show me
one that does. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
All the laws of Physics support creationism and none of the laws of
Phsysics violate the young earth creationism. I dare you show me
one that does. 😏

You show with this posting very well your ignorance of science. You, as a creatoist, don't know much about science.

Why don't you give good coordinates of the place where the first cell was created instead. You failed miserably with your mumbo jumbo coordinates when you tried.

Unless creationism means that you create your own failures?

Originally posted by FabianFnas
You show with this posting very well your ignorance of science. You, as a creatoist, don't know much about science.

Why don't you give good coordinates of the place where the first cell was created instead. You failed miserably with your mumbo jumbo coordinates when you tried.

Unless creationism means that you create your own failures?

See, I knew you would not believe me no matter what I do. You have
already made up your mind and you was just trying to get me to jump
ttrough some hoops for your own amusement. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
See, I knew you would not believe me no matter what I do. You have
already made up your mind and you was just trying to get me to jump
ttrough some hoops for your own amusement. 😏

You're getting off topic. Afraid of the topic, eh?

You gave me coordinates of the place where the first cell was created, you say. You don't want to give me your source. Why? Afraid of something?

If you say creationism is science, then here you have your chance of showing this. Guessing isn't science. Guessing is creationism.

I'm not very surpriced that no other creationist backs you up. You are too extreem even for them.

This is the last chance of being serious as a creationist. Do you stick with your coordinates given to me? And refuse to give me your source? Then you give me the chance of drawing my own conclusions. These conclusions I will give everyone to laugh at in a new thread, created to discuss the creationists fraud.

But I will give you a chance first... Just to give you the respect. And a chance.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
You're getting off topic. Afraid of the topic, eh?

You gave me coordinates of the place where the first cell was created, you say. You don't want to give me your source. Why? Afraid of something?

If you say creationism is science, then here you have your chance of showing this. Guessing isn't science. Guessing is creationism.

I'm not very surpric ...[text shortened]... fraud.

But I will give you a chance first... Just to give you the respect. And a chance.

Do you really thing scientist are not guessing? If you do, then you are
defintely one of the dumbest persons in the world. Of course, I guess
you have a lot of company. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Do you really thing scientist are not guessing? If you do, then you are
defintely one of the dumbest persons in the world. Of course, I guess
you have a lot of company. 😏

Scientists give their source when telling things. You don't. Don't compare you or your creationism with science. You will fail.

You have also failed to answer my question. Therefore I will prepare for a new thread showing the fraud of creationists.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Scientists give their source when telling things. You don't. Don't compare you or your creationism with science. You will fail.

You have also failed to answer my question. Therefore I will prepare for a new thread showing the fraud of creationists.

Be my guest. Have a good time. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Be my guest. Have a good time. 😏

Yes, thank you, I really have a good time.

You, in fact, help very nicely, to prove that creationism is wrong, dead wrong.