14 Dec '13 11:24>
Originally posted by stellspalfieSurely you jest. His first statement about fossils is to say there are practically no evidence for fossil humans. WRONG. Then he talks about a supposed similarity between the crash of human population and the crash of population as a result of the flood. The fossil record says humans crashed down to maybe 1000 individuals but the flood story has humans go down to 8 people. He uses that as if evolution timeline and biblical timeline was similar. But in reality, the human population crashed something like 180,000 years ago so there is no putting those two timelines together.
for theories put forward that claim to use science can we please have links to peer reviewed papers.
Originally posted by sonhousei like the bit where he says that saying humans came from the middle-east is the same as science saying they came from africa. he kinda shrugs shoulders like middle-east/africa whatever, same thing!!! ha!
Surely you jest. His first statement about fossils is to say there are practically no evidence for fossil humans. WRONG.
Originally posted by stellspalfieAnother tidbit: I tried to find out his professional associations and I find a whole bunch of Dr. Robert W Carters but the only listing I see for this dude is from creationist websites, like 'creationwiki'. I was surprised by how many Robert W Carters there are around with Phd's in various fields!
i like the bit where he says that saying humans came from the middle-east is the same as science saying they came from africa. he kinda shrugs shoulders like middle-east/africa whatever, same thing!!! ha!
Originally posted by RJHindsYou just don't get it. NOBODY is swayed by these opinion video's, your efforts come on to deaf ears.
Evidence for Creation: 2. Humanity is degenerating instead of evolving for the better
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT4JxzQ4aeI
Evidence for Creation: 3. Evidence for the Biblical origin of Humanity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nz5BsP-LIX8
Originally posted by RJHindscommon sense dictates that you should lean towards science that has been stringently tested and re-tested then published in peer reviewed papers. common sense dictates you should take anything else with a pinch of salt.
I believe there is somebody here that has common sense like me and could be swayed to believe as I do on creation.
Originally posted by RJHindsYou don't really go by evidence in ANY field do you? like this little experiment in futility you are running. Anyone come forward here and say, YEAH, that looks like the real deal'? NO, all you have had are nay sayers and I notice you got 5 thumbs down and not one thumbs up.
I believe there is somebody here that has common sense like me and could be swayed to believe as I do on creation.