Originally posted by @fmfWhen you’re on your deathbed and looking back on your life, are you going to be proud of this? Do you really think this is a worthwhile use of your time?
How old am I?
I’ve picked up some useful info re: the reconciliation of what Jesus taught with what Paul taught, but this forum is definitely harmed by the incessant trolling of atheists. I think Becker had the right idea about how to handle troll posts. If you have something substantive to post, I’d love to read and consider it and reply to it, but you’ll understand I’m sure if I don’t reply to any more posts like this last one.
Originally posted by @romans1009I will reply to this in all seriousness. Something pretty close to 100% of your posts since you arrived a few days ago have been addressed to divegeester, Ghost of a Duke and me.
I had hoped to engage in substantive debates on here but they are few and far between
And the vast majority of your posts have been on this thread. There are 29 other threads on the top page of threads of this forum, and another 30 on page 2. There are still active threads going back to page 3, meaning there are maybe as many 75 debates going on that you could contribute to.
There are also numerous fellow Christians here and numerous topics that they have started or engaged in.
What makes you say you hope for "substantive debates on here but they are few and far between"?
Originally posted by @romans1009I am quite content to have this forum as one of my hobbies and I do not begrudge the time I devote to it. What's your answer to the same question?
When you’re on your deathbed and looking back on your life, are you going to be proud of this? Do you really think this is a worthwhile use of your time?
Originally posted by @romans1009dj2becker basically said 'don't engage them', didn't he? He said "I think the best remedy for a troll is to ignore it". Is that how you are handling "troll posts"?
I think Becker had the right idea about how to handle troll posts.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat "bait"? I simply asked him this: "dj2becker basically said 'don't engage them', didn't he? He said "I think the best remedy for a troll is to ignore it". Is that how you are handling "troll posts"?" And I asked him that because he said this: "I think Becker had the right idea about how to handle troll posts".
Would you like him to continue responding to your bait?
1 edit
Originally posted by @fmfWhat I meant to say is 'trolling posts'. If a person asks a serious question and abandons their trolling I see no reason why he shouldn't respond to their post.
What "bait"? I simply asked him this: "dj2becker basically said 'don't engage them', didn't he? He said "I think the best remedy for a troll is to ignore it". Is that how you are handling "troll posts"?" And I asked him that because he said this: "I think Becker had the right idea about how to handle troll posts".
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat "bait" are you talking about?
What I meant to say is 'trolling posts'. If a person asks a serious question and abandons their trolling I see no reason why he shouldn't respond to their post.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhich of my posts are "bait"?
This type:
verb:
deliberately annoy or taunt (someone).